Scientism as a Modern World View

Scientism as a Modern WorldView

Scientism is the belief the scientific method and attack experiential acquisition is the best method of larning excepting all others. This idea came to prominence in the late 1700 and has had a trickle-down consequence through the centuries to present twenty-four hours. Get downing with the Gallic Revolution in 1794 and the beginnings of modern democratic ideals, scientific discipline was used to rapidly travel advancement along. The revolution in France drew a assortment of scientist interested in a more progressive and free society to pattern their beliefs. These beginnings continued into the Industrial Revolution in both European and American Movements in the late 1900s. The political and societal theories of George Hegel and Charles Darwin have been used over the centuries to warrant signifiers of “natural selection” which is an thought attributed to Darwin’s scientific theory.

Need essay sample on Scientism as a Modern World View ?We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $13.90/page

order now

The beginning of scientism become outstanding in the in-between to late 1700s and merged with the philosophical beliefs of the clip period. The Gallic Revolution gave birth to a assortment of doctrines and beliefs that would act upon authoritiess around the universe and still act upon them today. The call for democracy in France started the March to liberty in many states. France overthrew its Monarchy and installed a Democratic Government. The Democracy did non work but the state ne’er went back to a Monarchy with Rule through the Grace of God ( ) . The Enlightenment epoch philosphers joined the revolution in order to pattern free idea and be able to talk, compose, and teach through their beliefs. This extract from, “Science in the Revolution” by Charles Coulton Gillespie points out

“Not merely was the Gallic scientific community the most superb in the universe, it was besides the most extremely institutionalized-a circumstance which permits us to be definite about its history. On the 8th of August 1793, in the late summer of licking, dismay, and lese majesty, and on the lifting curve of the Terror, the Jacobin Convention abolished the erudite academies as incompatible with a Republic. Counterrevolutionary authors ever describe this step as a simple act of rational hooliganism. Furthermore, there is ground to believe that the Academy of Sciences, despite its healthy status compared to the humanistic academies, was the primary mark ( Gillespie 678 ) .

It is clear by the riddance of establishments of larning that the powers in charge were afraid of the cognition imparted by the philosophers. Scientific idea was non morally ethical, or so the political leaders of the twenty-four hours believed or wanted the multitudes to believe. The philosophers of the clip period believed in experiential acquisition and this rubbed the theological community the incorrect manner because one premiss was if you can non turn out the being of God ; you can merely believe and swear God is present. Harmonizing to Beutler inTruth, “We are populating in a society where everyone knows where babes come from and no 1 knows where truth comes from. Truth comes from God. ‘That ‘s your opinion.’ No. It ‘s the truth ( Buetler 1 ) . Some would state the rise of scientism suggests the diminution in a belief in God, but the truth is scientism become prevailing because of the truth of God. The fright that “science alienates, and these were passionate eruptions of that tenseness which must ever be between adult male ‘s scientific discipline and his desire to take part morally and through consciousness in the cosmic procedure ( Gillespie 681 ) . This is a baseless fright and should be put in proper position.

Scientism was the impulsive force of idea that ushered in the Industrial Revolution and the technological promotions that followed its outgrowth as a force to be considered. Even those who felt scientific discipline alienates were able to encompass the many innovations of the Industrial Revolution. These innovations became a portion of the civilization of the times and provided an easier life style for those who could afford the conventions. Science brought about three of import thoughts that have shaped the American cultural position. First, the criterion of life increased for many Americans ( “Science and technology…” ) . This created the category system that has evolved into the one we have today. Second, a sense of pride in state, or patriotism, spread quickly throughout the industrialised states ( “Science and technology…” ) . This is interpreted as nationalism that is now an American hallmark that makes other states view us as chesty socially backward people. Third, “the rise of capitalist economic systems came to divide the Earth into “ advanced ” and “ backward ” parts, making a distinguishable group of industrial states linked to myriad colonial dependences ( “Science and technology…” ) . So the influence of scientism on the civilization of the twenty-four hours had positive and negative influences.

The uncertainness or deficiency of lucidity on Hegel’s construct of the dialectic created the room for development of other doctrines that turned out to be non so great. This doctrine points out that “the head makes advancement bycreating antonyms, which are so combined in a synthesis, ” As a consequence this led the manner for the doctrine that “ tied hisphilosophy into patriotism by reasoning for a German nationaldialectic that would ensue in synthesis into a state.” ( Dialectalism” ) . As a consequence, the words of Marx and Engel were used to supply the foundations for the gravest episode in modern universe history. The epoch known as the Holocaust was based on the nationalist pride and the belief that one group of people were superior to others. This belief was a combination of Social Darwinism that grew out of the Hagiographas of Charles Darwin that supported the” endurance of the fittest” and “the strong will survive” ( Dixon ) . It was likely ne’er the purpose of Darwin, Hegel, or Marx for this gross reading and coaction of idea from their doctrines to engender such heretic version of their thoughts. To this twenty-four hours, “ the spiritual right continues to tie in Darwinwith Marx, and by tenuous association with dictatorship and atheism” ( Dixon ) .

This split in planetary economic systems had it footing in the Bolshevik Revolution and the coming of Communism espoused by Engels and Marx and was used to drive a state by Josef Stalin and subsequently Kruschev and presently Putin. The outgrowth of The Cold War after World War Two created an aura of fright derived from a myriad of throughs to eliminate, establish a atomic warhead, utilize a missile, imperativeness the ruddy button, etc. You could state this was direct consequence of scientific discipline or scientism. The industrialisation of the Soviet Union from an agricultural province made Stalin really confident in his ability to annex satellite states, control and keep his ain power from within, and a fundamentally guarantee his autocratic communistic political orientation survived ( Gaddis 89-91 ) .

Keep in head that when power is kept through autocratic controls, there will ever be person in the shadows waiting to wrest power from you. By all Histories, Stalin seemed to confident in his ability to command, but future leaders such Kruschev were non. After Stalin, the leading of the Soviet Union was ever well-founded, a best. That was portion of the ground that Kruschev was ever blustering about his “power” and “threats” to learn the chesty Americans a lesson by directing long scope missiles to Castro in Cuba ( Gaddis 70-71 ) . Basically, a stand-off occurred at the point and while Kennedy made his ultimatum to Kruchev, the state lived in fright of a missile work stoppage. The menace of atomic obliteration lasted into the 1980s and to some extent it still does. Science was ground behind these arms of mass devastation and as such changed the landscape of how wars were fought.

All in all, scientism changed the cultural landscape by presenting empirical experience as a factor in larning. Religion and scientific discipline had to accommodate themselves in order to coexist. The Enlightenment philosophers, along with Hegel and Darwin influenced the development of authoritiess around the universe. Science has had so many influences in the 20th century through World War I, World War II, and the Cold War epoch even to modern times.

Plants Cited

Beutler, Keith. “Truth.” N.p.1992. Course Handout.

Boom, Corey Ten. The Hiding Place..

Dixon, Kevin. “Darwin and Marx.”Darwin 200 in Devon.WordPress, N.d. Eddystone

Net Technologies. & A ; lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // ? page_id=269 & A ; gt ; .

“From Aprile to Paracelsus: The Changing Dialectical Thoughtscape of Nineteenth-Century

Europe and America.”Dialecticism in Nineteenth Century European Thought.Scribd,

N.p. N.d. 14 March 2014.Course Handout.

Gaddis, John Lewis. The Cold War” A New Story. New York. Penguin Books, 2005.

Gillespie, Charles Coulston. “Science in the Gallic Revolution.” Anthropology,

VOL. 45, 1959. Princeton University, 1959. Web. N.p. N.d. 15 Mar 2014.

“Science and Technology – The 2nd industrial revolution and the progressive era.”

Encyclopedia of New American Nation. 2014. Advameg, Inc.



Get your custom essay sample

Let us write you a custom essay sample

from Essaylead

Hey! So you need an essay done? We have something that you might like - do you want to check it out?

Check it out