A Common Swot Analysis of Unilever and P & G Essay

September 12, 2017 History

Common Strengths

The strong stigmatization of the two companies make them one of the most successful trade names in the universe. Extensive experience in selling in different market sections and is two of the best sellers in the universe. Known for its diverse trade name portfolio. The companies are able to custom-make their planetary merchandises and trade names harmonizing to the local penchants. Significant graduated tables of range and economic systems in their operations Access to planetary resources and synergism of resources and operations

Common Opportunities

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Use of on-line societal webs and internet selling techniques. Rise in buying power and population in developing states ( China. Indonesia. Thailand-these markets are less concentrated and less competitory ) Increasing demand for healthy merchandises due to better consumer consciousness


There is a cut pharynx competition in the fast traveling consumer’s goods markets today The other rivals are doing their merchandise portfolios diverse twenty-four hours by twenty-four hours and utilizing different selling and promotional schemes to increase their market portion. In the market many replacements are available for merchandises at cheaper monetary values. This is specially impacting the scheme of P & A ; G Due to recession. the consumer disbursement has decreased globally. Besides. the monetary values for natural stuffs are increasing so cost to the company is increasing. Government intercessions in developing markets


The big scale operations of the two companies make the civilizations heavy and processes slow. This besides leads to quality control jobs. Complex organisational constructions ( franchises with many associates. joint ventures and bureau relationships ) Lack of direct connexion with ultimate consumers due to dependence on retail merchants and jobbers ( in Western states retail giants such as Tesco. Asda and Sainsbury are really strong and have the ability to order large transnational companies ) . Inefficient direction of trade names ( being unable differentiate between stars. cashcows and Canis familiariss harmonizing to Mandelow’ s Matrix eg-25 trade names of Unilever history for 73 % of planetary gross revenues and about half of P & A ; G’s gross revenues come from its top 10 trade names )


I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out