advantages of presidential systems

July 20, 2017 Law

One of the advantages of a presidential system is that the caput of province is normally elected through a direct authorization. In footings of democracy, this makes the president ‘s authorization more legitimate as he is elected straight by the people as oppose to being appointed indirectly. Another advantage of a presidential system is the stableness it brings as presidents are normally elected to fixed footings while a premier curate ‘s authorities can fall at anytime. An illustration of this is in Canada ; where in a minority authorities the leader of the resistance, Michael Ignatieff, could convey down Stephen Harper ‘s authorities and has threatened to make so several times. This is in contrast to President Obama ‘s term of office which is secure till the elections of 2012. Additionally, presidential system let for the separation of powers as the legislative assembly is a wholly different construction and establishment. This allows a system of cheques and balances to be created, leting one to supervise the other. Speed and decision can be seen as a positive feature of a presidential system, as presidents normally have stronger constitutional powers leting them to spearhead reform and enact alteration fleetly.

Conversely, one advantage of a parliamentary system is that it ‘s faster and easier to go through statute law. This is because the executive subdivision is portion of the legislative subdivision and is dependent upon the direct or indirect support of it as it normally comprised of members of the legislative assembly. This can be seen in the Canadian system of authorities where the premier curate and his cabinet is besides Member of Parliament. This segues into the advantage that parliamentary systems normally have a higher leaning for holding incorporate authoritiess, as minority authoritiess are the minority. This adds to the authorities ‘s ability to go through statute law more rapidly, as it is rare for a bulk authorities to hold their ain statute law defeated, as parliamentary system normally have greater party subject. Furthermore, the deficiency of a caput of province ‘s veto power besides allows statute law to go through more fleetly. Another advantage of a parliamentary system is that power is more equally diverged. Constitutionally, the premier curate seldom has such high importance of a president. An illustration of this is how parliamentary systems allow MPs to straight oppugn the premier curate and his authorities. Besides, lower single importance on the premier minster place can be seen through elections inclinations as there is a higher focal point on political party thoughts than on the existent individual. Last, the advantage of the authorities technically being able to fade out at any clip allows the authorities to be more accountable and feasible. This allows parliament to replace a authorities or a premier curate if he or she has been lacklustre or damaging to the state. This allows for operable authoritiess to go on regulating while uneffective 1s can be disposed of.

Disadvantages to a presidential system include inclinations towards dictatorship. Because of the overarching power given to one individual, presidential systems could rapidly transform into autocratic governments if fortunes permit. Besides the centralisation of authorization could take to the president going a more influential figure in society and the media. This high precedence on the president could take down and sabotage civic engagement as people might experience they can non play an active function in lawmaking or topographic point a lower significance on the legislative subdivisions of authorities relation to the executive. Furthermore, separation of powers is besides seen as a disadvantage of the presidential system as it might make gridlock and deadlocks within the authorities. One illustration of this could be if the President continues to blackball measures that the legislative assembly ratifies, hindering authorities from go throughing Torahs. This can be seen in 1995 when Democrat Bill Clinton was president with a Republican controlled Congress. The authorities could non acquire consensus on anything, non even on a budget. Last, hindrances to leading alteration can be seen as another disadvantage as it can be more hard to take an unsuitable president from office before her term is concluded, making a possible state of affairs where an graven image or unhelpful president could non be removed and be replaced a better option.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

On the other manus, disadvantages to a parliamentary system include that the caput of authorities is normally non straight elected. This is because the premier curate is typically elected by the legislative assembly or the party in power, which usually means the party leading. In add-on, another disadvantage in the parliamentary system is that there is no independent organic structure to oppose and blackball statute law approved by parliament, and therefore a deficiency of a cohesive cheques and balance system. Besides, because of the deficit in the separation of powers, parliamentary systems could transfuse excessively much power in the executive. This is because MPs normally have to adhere to parliamentary subject, and can non vote based on their ain judgements or constituencies. Furthermore, as elections in parliamentary systems normally result in a bulk authorities, this could take to the “ dictatorship of the bulk ” ensuing in the minority parties to be marginalized as they would hold small to no input in authorities statute law. Furthermore, parliamentary systems can be seen as inherently unstable, if minority authoritiess are elected and alliance authoritiess are formed as the authorities can be brought down at any clip. Oppositions of the parliamentary system point to Japan ‘s recent instabilities and changeless replacement of premier curates every bit good as Weimar Germany as illustrations where unstable alliances, aggressive minority parties, and changeless menaces of the authorities being voted down by resistance parties. Last, the parliamentary system deficiency of a definite election calendar can be mistreated to let parties to derive political advantages. The regulating party can schedule elections with comparative freedom, and avoid elections when it is unpopular. Indeed, in a Canadian context, Prime Minister Stephen Harper defeated his ain authorities because polls showed that he had the ability to win a bulk at the clip. This gives an unjust advantage to governing parties who can stave off licking or increase their authorization at the disbursal of the resistance parties.

The influence of a presidential system on political relations can be seen through the stronger function of the president I every bit good as the gridlock that can be experienced when go throughing statute law. This is opposed to the parliamentary system and how a premier curate normally has a smaller function in political relations while parliament is typically speedy in go throughing statute law and avoiding gridlock. First, the president normally becomes a national figure, which represents the authorities regardless of the effectivity of statute law. As policies are harder to nail compared to parliamentary systems, a president normally receives all unfavorable judgment and incrimination on statute law passed, irrespective if the party passed it or non. However in parliamentary systems, the regulating party normally receives congratulations and unfavorable judgment for statute law passed with non everything being placed upon the premier curate. This segues into the president is the caput of province, and executing ceremonial functions every bit good as being the commanding officer in head of the armed forces. He besides plays an active function in the authorities by puting out a authorities ‘s docket particularly if her party is besides in control of the legislative assembly. This differs from parliamentary system as there is a more seeable separation of caput of province and caput of authorities. An illustration of this is the Queen in the UK who about entirely performs ceremonial functions. The Queen by convention does non blackball any statute law passed by the authorities, as she does non hold that legitimacy given through the electorate. This differs from the premier curate who is straight involved in the lawmaking variety meats of parliament. The president in a presidential system is about like the halfway portion of a venn-diagram as she possesses the ceremonial portion of the caput of province while playing active function in the authorities procedure like a premier curate. Another influence that a president has on parliament is his function in the cheques in balance system. The United States authorities is must more used to gridlock and deadlocks between the degrees of authorities and even between to the two houses as that is how the system is set up to me. This is in contrast where statute law is Canada can be passed instead quickly particularly if the party has a bulk authorities. This presidential system influences the manner representatives behave as they


I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out