There are merely a choice few persons in this universe that could be considered as exceeding. There are many great names in the universe of literature. but this paper would merely concentrate on two great authors and their several plants. William Shakespeare is considered by many as the greatest author that has of all time lived. He is even nicknamed “the immortal” by literature partisans. On the other manus Robert Frost is a great poet. whose plants had taken the poesy genre by storm. This paper will do a comparing of two plants of these two great authors: Shakespeare’s Epilogue for Prospero and Frost’s “After Apple-Picking. ”
The two plants were communicated under the same medium. poesy. Both plants were using poetic devices such as symbolism. imagination. initial rhyme. etc.
The map of both plants is to assail the emotions of the readers. “After Apple-Picking” is a verse form about composing a verse form. Frost tells the readers that composing poesy is an backbreaking undertaking “I am overtired” ( Line 29 ) But that fatigue of a poet could be relieved by the audience grasp “of the great crop I myself desired. ”’
The image of the many apples is a symbol for creativeness. Frost is merely reasoning that there is an copiousness of creativity—the job is that reaping that creativeness could pall out an creative person.
On the other manus. Shakespeare’s words through Prospero is specifically categorized as a monologue. This peculiar literary technique is made celebrated by Shakespearean dramas. like in Hamlet’s “to be or non to be” monologue. A monologue is fundamentally done when a character of the drama straight addresses the audience. In traditional theatre. there is the being of the “fourth wall. ”
The “fourth wall” is extremely proficient to discourse but it fundamentally refers to the spread between the histrions and the audience. In other footings. the world in the phase is really far from the world of existent life. Formalistically in dramas. a character should ne’er interact with the audience. merely because it ruins the semblance. This may be the really deign of Shakespeare for Prospero’s monologue. Shakspere does non desire his work to be a mere semblance. he wanted it to be something existent. And harmonizing to the text. what could do it existent. or Prospero free. is merely the hand clapping of the audience.
Shakespeare’s message is no different with Frost’s. During Prospero’s epilogue. Prospero is merely inquiring for an hand clapping to put him free “…without hand clapping / my program to delight you has failed”
It is similar in both of the plants to acknowledge that there is an audience. Both of them may hold merely stating that the readers/audiences are merely every bit of import as the piece itself. If it was non for the grasp of those who enjoy the beauty of words. literature would non be.
Frost. Robert. “After Apple-picking” . Retrieved 5 June 2008
& lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. wsu. edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_2/frost_apple. hypertext markup language & gt ;
Shakespeare. William. The Tempest. Retrieved 5 June 2008 & lt ;
Shakespeare. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. edu/tempest/full. hypertext markup language & gt ;