A reading of William Blake’s “The Lamb” brings Forth a really religious and obvi-ously pastoral message in a traditional ( for the epoch ) Christian subject. Blake efficaciously uses several techniques of harmoniousness and economic system which set Forth and magnify the sense of spiritualty and artlessness. His usage of repeat. metaphor. and compendious soft semblances provide the reader with a compelling devotional and brooding work that sounds every bit much supplication as verse form. Often the repeats of poetic lines will in the least add accent and at most supply a jarring counterpoint to the coveted fluidness of motion.
In the instance of “The Lamb” the repeat gives about a sing-song childish meter which rapidly sets the tone by opening the first stanza: “Little Lamb who made thee Dist 1000 know who made thee…” ( Lines 1. 2 ) Then he reinforces the gap by shuting the stanza: “Little Lamb who made thee Dost 1000 know who made thee” ( Lines 10. 11 ) Combined with the careful rhyming during the stanza. “feed-mead” . “delight-bright” and “voice-rejoice” it produces more a soft tune reminiscent of a cradlesong. with the repeti-tion puting Forth intermission and relaxation.
The method continues in the 2nd stanza. with a cumulative consequence. as the gap inquiry is shortly to be answered: “Little lamb I’ll Tell thee “Little lamb I’ll Tell thee…” ( Lines 13. 14 ) Again. with possibly less careful riming during the 2nd stanza. “name. Lamb” . “mild. child” and reversed “lamb. name” the strategy is still effectual because of the form. puting “name-lamb-mild-child-lamb-name” . followed by the non-rhyme “we are called by his name” which sets up the shutting “answer” : “Little Lamb God bless thee. “Little Lamb God bless thee.
” ( Lines 21. 22 ) Metaphorically the “little Lamb” is of class mention to Jesus Christ. “For he calls himself a Lamb” ( Line 16 ) . the Lamb of God. Like the small lamb Jesus Christ “is meek and he is mild” ( Line 17 ) . Jesus Christ. born unto The Virgin Mary “became a small child” ( Line 18 ) every bit good. and both the lamb and the storyteller are kids of and made in the image of Jesus Christ: “I a kid & A ; thou a lamb We are called by his name. ” ( Lines 19. 20 ) Additional metaphors exist ; who is it. the storyteller asks the Lamb who gave you life. nutrient and H2O?
Harmonizing to Christian belief and Catholic ritual “life” itself comes from “the organic structure and blood of Christ” . The subject carries further with the construct of Jesus Christ as the Good Shepherd everlastingly vigilant in protecting his guiltless flock of sheep and lambs. Blake creates an overall luster through linguistic communication. absent any irritants. wolves or endangering storms. There is no “fire and brimstone” . lambs about to be placed on the sac-rificial alter. or huddling from occupying marauders.
Alternatively there is “clothing of delight” which is the “softest vesture wooly bright” and of class the soft voice of the lamb which makes all within hearing “rejoice” . Blake uses these techniques in bring forthing a masterwork of brevity. turn outing the theory. peculiarly appropriate to prose and poetry. that less is frequently more. In a light 22 lines he is able to make a really strong image of guiltless beauty within the greater thought of God’s creative activity every bit good as protection ( “God bless thee” ) .
Intentional or non the verse form gives non merely comfort but strength. The universe as Blake knew it was surely filled with devastation. ugliness and uncertainness every bit much. or even more so than any other epoch in history. There is a reassurance. created by the repeat and beat. every bit good as a sense of relaxation. of decelerating down and reflecting in the face of feverish uncertainness. Life of class is anything but a arcadian vision free of malignity. and unluckily for every lamb there is a wolf.
Blake is non so blind as to non see there is ever a dichotomy to life. a balance between the poles of composure and rage. artlessness and immorality. Blake has produced the counterpoint every bit good. with “The Tyger” . besides from his “Songs of Experience” . Here he asks the inquiry “did he who made the Lamb do thee? ” ( Tyger. Line 20 ) . By making so he forces the reader to confront the dateless inquiry of how both can be created by the same God merely to populate in contradiction to each other. As with any metaphysical inquiry there is no clear reply. and likely there should non be.
It is the designation. contemplation and articulation of the inquiry that affairs. There is no get awaying the being of The Tyger or any figure of marauders and for what ground they exist adult male can merely theorize. William Blake has provided his audience with much to contemplate as they make their guess. Works Cited Blake. William. “The Lamb” . “The Tyger” . Songs Of Innocence and of Experience. transcript Z. London: Catherine and William Blake. 1789. Works available in entireness at hypertext transfer protocol: //www. rc. umd. edu/rchs/reader/tygerlamb. hypertext markup language