In “Bullet in the Brain” ( 1995 ) . Tobias Woolf conveys the narrative of a adult male named Anders. a book critic. who experiences one concluding memory after being shot in the caput by bank robbers. The narrative begins with Anders come ining a Bank in the shutting hours and knocking the long lines and bad service. Then. two bank robbers hold up the bank and stop up hiting Anders in the caput for his chesty behaviour. Woolf so goes on to explicate his last memory as he is deceasing from his lesions. The bank robbers dialogue is of import. The different ways that Wolff depicts the Robber’s duologue greatly influences the tone of the narrative. Wolff’s manner of utilizing curious responses from the bank robbers is about like a decease trap for the critical Anders. He dares to tease the robbers and makes dry comments on their use of words. “Hey! Bright male child! Did I tell you to speak. . Did you hear that. Bright male child. Right out of the killers” ( Anders202 ) . Anders finds their words distinctive plenty that he needs to do a remark about it. By disregarding what the robbers do and state he makes the state of affairs worse as the robbers start to lose their caput because of him.
A nervous robber is much more unsafe than a calmed one and Anders would see this but he does non. He doesn’t recognize that he merely put the people in danger every bit good as himself. even when he was asked to be quiet by a adult female following to him. The adult female is cognizant of the earnestness of the state of affairs unlike Anders and attempts to salvage her and possibly the others’ life every bit good. A individual who does non take attention of a unsafe state of affairs is foolish but in this instance Anders does non take attention of the others’ safety as good and considers the unfavorable judgment more of import than the people’s life around him. Wolff besides brings out a humourous tone with the robbers duologue. He uses expressed words that give readers a more graphic image of the robber’s personalities. The words let readers acquire a sense of the character they have. In one scene the Wolff writes. “ You like me. bright male child? . . You want to suck my dick” ( 202 ) . Obviously. this shows the robber has a infantile type of wit.
One can besides state this type of wit is more consistent with person immature instead than an older individual. Alternatively of Wolff explicating the features of the robbers. he lets the readers figure it out themselves. Wolff gives small item about the features of the robber. The ammoniac odor coming out of his oral cavity gives a sense that he is under the influence of some type of drug. His jerking oculus instead reveals that he is merely highly nervous or he is merely high on drugs. Last. The manner the robbers address the people inside the bank is of import to the subject. It brings out the aggressive tone. It was a good manner to move like professional robbers and do people think if they try to be a hero in this state of affairs they will be shot. “One of you Tellers hit the dismay. you’re all dead meat. Get it? ” ( 201 ) . The robbers uses truly demanding words to terrorise the people. They are besides able to take down the security and put him on his articulatio genuss.
This scheme non merely takes down the Bankss best line of defence. but it besides lets the clients and workers acknowledge that they mean concern and will ache person that gets in their manner. Cipher thinks they are a hero and can interrupt up three or more people particularly if they are keeping guns in their custodies so this tactic works really good except that Anders is at that place. Anders is at that place and makes them truly adrenalized as he besides makes the state of affairs more unsafe. Anders’ behavior is clearly blameworthy for the actions taken by the robbers. The aggressive tone did non even pass through Anders’ head and he did non waver to do a comment.
His ain felicity and joy in happening imperfection in everything led to his ruin. It would be really sensible to state the Anders triggered his ain ruin but the robbers manner of pass oning besides ignited the state of affairs. Anders criticizes everything and the manner of speaking that the robbers conversate with was clearly typical plenty for Anders to hold a remark about it. Their duologue provoked Anders. Who knows if there would hold been a different attack of conversating from the robbers. so the narrative could hold had a different stoping. There will be no happy terminal for this narrative and Anders behaviour adds oil to the fire and do him responsible for his ain decease.