Canterbury Tales The Narrators Naive View Point

June 7, 2018 General Studies

Canterbury Tales, The Narrators Naive View Point Of The Characters Essay, Research Paper

In The Canterbury Tales Geoffery Chauser illuminates the na ve point of view of the storyteller in the descriptions of the characters. This is shown by the manner the storyteller frequently extols the characters, despite some obvious disagreements. The Cook is an illustration of this. The storyteller describes the cook as being a more than equal chef, yet in the center of the description he throws in That on his radiance a mormal hadde he, ( Chaucer 388 ) . This transition is doing mention to an ulcer on the Cook s shin, which is demoing him as non the cleanest of persons. Furthermore one can see a more secular single would hold had a difficult clip looking past the Cook s sordid visual aspect, particularly in relation to the nutrient he made. Even worse is the fact that his description of the Cook s abilities comes likely from what the cook had said to the storyteller instead than existent experience with his nutrient, although the storyteller does do specific mention to the Cook s pudding. This willingness to believe in a characters testimony is besides apparent in the description of the Knight. The storyteller expresses the Knight s amazing military achievements without uncertainty of the Knight s hyperbole. Yet the many conquests the Knight said his took portion in occurred all over the universe. Above alle nacions in Pruce ( Prussia ) ; in Lettuo had he reised ( campaigned ) , and in Ruse ( Russia ) no Christen adult male so ofte of his grade ; in Gernade ( Granada ) at the sege eek hadde he be. Of Algezir, and riden in Belmarye ; at Lyeis was he and at S

atalye, ( Chaucer 53-58 ) Anyone with a obscure cognition of geographics would hold realized that the Knight could non hold perchance taken portion in all these runs. The storyteller s failure to acknowledge this shows the extent to the storyteller s naivete.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Furthermore, a reader might frequently happen that the storyteller is non truly perspicacious in his judgement of the characters, in fact for the most portion his judgements seem mostly based on sophism. This sophism can be straight attributed to his puerile position of the universe. This hapless understanding of virtuousness is blatantly obvious in his description of the Friar. The storyteller says, Ther was no adult male nowher so vertuous ( virtuous ) ( Chaucer 251 ) . However earlier in the text he is said to He cognize the tavernes wel in every town, and every hostiler ( host ) and tapestere ( Barmaid ) , bet ( better ) than a leper or a beggestere ( mendicant ) . ( Chaucer 240-242 ) . One can reason from this transition that the storyteller is non a genuinely wise justice of character, but an extremely na ve person, based on his claims that a Friar who better knows the barmaids than mendicants is a virtuous man.In this manner the Chaucer uses the storyteller to make a kind of self-contradictory wit with the descriptions, in some instances go forthing the sentiment of the storyteller as a sort of non sequitur that differs greatly from the single demeanor of a character. Overall the descriptions of the characters in The Canterbury Tales can be seen as an attestation of the impressionability of the storyteller. There for the descriptions of the characters highlight the na ve point of view of the storyteller. by Pete Smith

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out