Confessions of a Shopaholic is a 2009 American romantic comedy film and rather popular in American. This film adapts the two books The Secret Dream universe of a Shopaholic and Shopaholic Abroad which in the United States were known as Confessions of a Shopaholic. The ground why the author chooses this film to be analyzed is because the author really interested with the characters that makes this film so fabulous and attractive. That ‘s why the author uses the psychological theory to analyse the character in this film. Before analysing this film, it ‘s better to cognize and understand the secret plan of the narrative foremost.
Rebecca Bloomwood is a shopping nut who lives with her best friends, Suze. She works as a journalist, but she wants to work in her favourite manner magazine, Allete. On the manner to an interview with Alette, she buys a green scarf. Unfortunately her recognition card is declined, so Rebecca goes to a hot Canis familiaris base and offers to purchase all the hot Canis familiariss with a cheque, if the marketer gives her back alteration in hard currency, stating the scarf is to be a gift for her ill aunt. The hot Canis familiaris seller refuses but a adult male offers her $ 20.
When Rebecca arrives at the interview, she ‘s told that the place has been filled. However, the receptionist tells her there is an unfastened place with the magazine Successful Saving, explicating how acquiring a occupation at Successful Savings could finally take to a place at Alette magazine. Rebecca interviews with Luke Brandon, the editor of Successful Savings and the adult male who merely gave her the $ 20. She hides her scarf outside his office, but Luke ‘s helper comes into the office and gives it back to her. Rebecca knows the game is up and foliages.
That eventide, rummy, she and Suze write letters to Alette and Successful Saving, but she mails each to the incorrect magazine. Luke likes the missive she meant to direct to Alette and hires her. Rather than finishing a work assignment for a new column from Luke, Rebecca goes to a vesture sale. While inspecting a brace of cashmere baseball mitts she has merely purchased, she realizes it is non 100 % cashmere and she has been duped. This gives her an thought for the column, which she writes under the name “ The Girl in the Green Scarf ” and success.
Rebecca subsequently returns place to renewed confrontations with her debt aggregator, so Suze makes her attend Shopaholics Anonymous. The group leader, Miss Korch, forces Rebecca to donate all the apparels she merely bought, including a maid of honor ‘s frock for Suze ‘s nuptials and a frock for a Television interview. After the meeting Rebecca ca n’t afford to purchase back both and buys back the interview frock. During the interview, Rebecca is accused by debt aggregator non paying her debts and loses her occupation. Suze is angry when she finds out that Rebecca lost the maid of honor frock. Alette offers Rebecca a place at the magazine, but Rebecca diminutions. She afraid she will do many errors in that magazine. She sells most of her apparels to pay her debts, including the green scarf. Meanwhile, Luke starts a new company, Brandon Communications.
Rebecca ‘s apparels sale makes it possible to pay her debts. Rebecca attends Suze ‘s nuptials after repossessing her maid of honor frock, and Suze forgives her. Luke returns the green scarf after uncovering that the individual who bought it at an auction was moving as his agent. Rebecca becomes romantically involved with Luke and starts working at his new company.
Actually the secret plan is really interesting. The manner that she was drops, it imagined with lost her best friend and fellow because her nut. That ‘s the last point why the author chooses this film.
Having considered the above facts, the author purposes a survey entitled A Psychological Study of the Main Character, Rebecca Bloomwood in Confessions of a Shopaholic Movie ( 2009 ) : Jungian Psycho Analysis ( Archetypal Approach ) .
Field of the Study
This survey belongs to Literature and Film surveies
Scope of the Study
This survey will discourse about the image and life style of the chief character in this film. It will be analyzed utilizing one of the psychological theories, Jungian Archetypal Approach.
What are the descriptions of certain Jungian archetypal attack found in this film that influence Rebecca ‘s character development?
What images does she make in the film?
How does the Jungian Archetypes work in Rebecca Bloomwood?
Aims of the Study
To explicate certain Jungian archetypal attack that influence Rebecca ‘s character development
To explicate what images that Rebecca creates in the film
To depict how Jungian Archetypes work in the chief character
Significance of the Study
The author hopes by reading this survey, the reader more understand about the image and life style of chief character in the film. Besides, they besides know about the psychological theory particularly Jungian Archetypal Theory that can be mentions and benefit for those who wants composing about this theory.
Definition of Footings
There are several footings that used in this survey:
The Archetype Theory:
This theory explains about the personality and behaviour of the chief character.
Theory of Individuation Process:
Based on the Carl Gustav Jung Theory, Individuation Process is a procedure to go mature, so he or she must to be cognizant to his or her ego. They should open themself to do an betterment of their personality.
It is human ‘s innate inclination to respond in peculiar manner whenever their experiences stimulate a biologically inherited response inclination.
The side of personality that people show to the universe. The character includes his or her societal functions, sort of apparels that they choose to have on, and their single manners to show themselves.
The individual must be converted into a positive force by some supportive elements so that he or she can make the balance.
One supportive component for shadow that personifies all feminine psychological inclinations in a adult male ‘s mind such as obscure feelings and tempers, prophetic intuitions, receptivity to unreasons, capacity for personal love, experiencing for nature.
One supportive component for shadow that personifies all masculine psychological inclinations in a adult female ‘s mind such as rational, nonsubjective, formal and deciding, anxiously moved by experiencing or tenderness, extremely appreciate power and heroism.
Hero is an original that represented in mythology and legends as a powerful individual, sometimes one who fights immorality.
The ego is the most of import personality original and besides the most hard to understand.
Reappraisal of Literature
Psychological type is a theory of personality developed by Swiss head-shrinker Carl G. Jung to explicate the normal differences between healthy people. Based on his observations, Jung concluded that differences in behavior consequence from persons ‘ inborn inclinations to utilize their heads in different ways. As people act on these inclinations, they develop predictable forms of behaviour. In this survey, one of the psychological types that the author uses is Jungian Archetypal attack. This attack will be used in this survey to understand the image and life style of the chief character. The author will merely utilize some of Jungian theory related to the intended treatment such as the character, the shadow, the anima/animus, the hero, and the ego because the job is merely relevant with some peculiar portion of theory.
Archetype is a universally recognizable component that recurs across all literature and life. It is an originally theoretical account or form from which other later transcripts are made, particularly a character, an action, or state of affairs that seems to stand for common forms of human life. Archetypes frequently include symbol, subject scene, or a character that some critics think have a common significance in the full human race. Psychologist Carl Jung called these elements a sort of “ corporate unconscious ” of the human race, prototypes instead than something gained from experience. These non merely manifest themselves in the subconscious stuff of dreams, but besides persistently expressed in the more consciously constructed stuff of myths and literature. The corporate unconscious is Jung ‘s boldest and most controversial construct. Jung identifies the corporate, or transpersonal, unconscious as the centre of all psychic stuff that does non come from personal experience. Its contents and images appear to be shared with people of all clip periods and all civilizations. Some psychologists, such as Skinner, implicitly assume that each person is born as a clean slate, a tabula rasa ; accordingly, psychological development can come merely from personal experience. Jung postulates that the head of the baby already possesses a construction that casts and channels all farther development and interaction with the environment. This basic construction is basically the same in all babies. Although we develop otherwise and go alone persons, the corporate unconscious is common to all people and is hence one ( Jung, 1951a ) .
Jung ‘s attack to the Collective unconscious can be seen in the undermentioned transition from a missive to one of his patients: Harmonizing Carl Jung, the original itself is non available straight to see merely its image and created forms can go manifest and capable to see by the mind.
Archetypal theory begins with Carl Jung. In his theory contains literary archetypical analysis and one treatment of James Joyce ‘s Ulysses. Archetypal procedure is that these two postmodern motions might in a sense articulation forces, thereby beef uping each other and supplying a common forepart against the dampening flight of late modernness, which threatens the life of single with meaningless and the life of the planet with devastation. ( David Ray 1875-1961 ) Archetypal psychological science is a post-Jungian psychological science ( Samuel, 1985 ) , a critical amplification of Jungian Theory. The Archetypal is non a class but a consideration- a perspectival operation that an person may execute on any image. Therefore, Hilman ( 1977, pp. 82-83 ) says that any image may be considered as an archetypal.
Now the author would wish to explicate about Jungian Archetypal theory. The first theory of Jungian Archetypes which is relevant to the job is the Persona. The word Persona originally meant the mask that the histrion put on to presume a portion in a drama. Jung used the basic definition to depict his psychological original. The character is witting outer face, societal mask that put on to hide the private ego which lies within. It is necessary to keep the character so that can transport out the maps that society expects. The character creates a lasting and favourable feeling on society ‘s members and will do the person more readily acceptable their eyes. One individual might hold more than one mask. Each mask merely helps to conform in assorted ways to a broad scope of state of affairss that face in public lives.
The character has both negative and positive facets. A dominant character can surround the person, and those who identify with their characters tend to see themselves merely in footings of their superficial societal functions and frontages. In fact, Jung called the character the “ conformance original. ” As portion of its positive map, it protects the self-importance and the mind from the varied societal forces and attitudes that impinge on them. The character is, in add-on, a valuable tool for communicating. In Roman drama the histrions ‘ boldly drawn masks informed the full audience clearly, if somewhat stereotypically, of the personality and attitudes of the function each histrion was playing. The character can frequently be important to our positive development. As we begin to play a certain function, our self-importance bit by bit comes to place with it. This procedure is cardinal to personality development.
This procedure is non ever positive, nevertheless. As the self-importance identifies with the character, people start to believe that they are what they pretend to be. Harmonizing to Jung, we finally have to retreat this designation and learn who we are in the procedure of individualization. Minority group members and other societal foreigners in peculiar are likely to hold jobs with their individualities because of cultural bias and societal rejection of their characters ( Hopcke, 1995 ) .
The 2nd theory of Jungian Archetypes is The Shadow. The shadow is one facet of that ego tend to disregard and quash from consciousness. Many people tend to cover up their shadow with their character. The shadow, moreover displays a degree of emotionalism that is rather echt and self-generated.
The 3rd theory of Jungian Archetype is The Anima/Animus. Besides the shadow original, the corporate unconscious contains a sub-personality of the individual ‘s complementary gender. Jung postulated an unconscious construction that is the complement of the persona-the anima in adult male and the animosity in adult female. This basic psychic construction serves as a focal point for all the psychological stuff that does non suit with an person ‘s witting self-image as a adult male or as a adult female. Therefore to the extent that a adult female consciously defines herself in feminine footings, her animosity will include those unrecognised inclinations and experiences that she has defined as masculine. For a adult female the procedure of psychological development entails come ining into a duologue between her self-importance and her animosity. The animosity may be pathologically dominated by designation with archetypical images ( for illustration, the bewitched prince, the romantic poet, the ghostly lover, or the predatory plagiarist ) and/or by an utmost male parent arrested development. ( Moore, 19990 )
The animosity or anima ab initio seems to be a entirely separate personality. As the animus/anima and its influence on the person is recognized, it assumes the function of affair between witting and unconscious until it bit by bit becomes integrated into the ego. Jung views the quality of this brotherhood of antonyms ( in this instance, masculine and feminine ) as the major measure in individualization.
The most of import original of all is The Self. The ego is the most of import personality original and besides the most hard to understand. Jung has called the ego the cardinal original, the original of psychological order and the entirety of the personality. The ego is the original of centeredness. It is the brotherhood of the witting and the unconscious that embodies the harmoniousness and balance of the assorted opposing elements of the mind. The ego directs the operation of the whole mind in an incorporate manner. Harmonizing to Jung, “ [ C ] onscious and unconscious are non needfully in resistance to one another, but complement one another to organize a entirety, which is the ego ” ( 1928b, p. 175 ) . Jung discovered the self-archetype merely after his probes of the other constructions of the personality.
The ego is depicted in dreams or images impersonally ( as a circle, mandala, crystal, or rock ) or personally ( as a royal twosome, a Godhead kid, or some other symbol of deity ) . Great religious instructors, such as Christ, Muhammed, and Buddha, are besides symbols for the ego. These are all symbols of integrity, fusion, rapprochement of mutual oppositions, and dynamic equilibrium — the ends of the individualization procedure ( Edinger, 1996 ) . Jung explains the map of the ego:
The self-importance receives the visible radiation from the Self. Though we know of this Self, yet it is non known… . Although we receive the visible radiation of consciousness from the Self and although we know it to be the beginning of our light, we do non cognize whether it possesses anything we would name consciousness… . If the Self could be entirely experienced, it would be a limited experience, whereas in world its experience is limitless and eternal… . If I were one with the Self I would hold cognition of everything, I would talk Sanskrit, read cuneiform book, know the events that took topographic point in pre-history be acquainted with the life of other planets, etc. ( 1975, pp.194-195 )
Jungian psychological science has amplified many aspects of the original, but no 1 has attempted to examine more deeply into the cardinal construction of archetypical world ( Russell A Lockhart ( 234-237 ) . Jung ‘s theory and pattern require changeless elaboration of archetypical subjects as found in literature, and by his theory, many others have implemented archetypical theory in literary unfavorable judgment.
Research of Methodology
To understand the intent of the survey which discuss about image and life style of the chief character on the film, the author uses an cyberspace and library research. Using this method, the beginnings included some thesis ‘s were collected from many books taken from Soegijapranata Catholic University library and besides used on-line beginnings from the cyberspace. By all these beginnings, the author sees it an easier manner to analyse the intended job. The author chooses original film entitled Confessions of a Shopaholic produced by Jerry Bruckheimer. The complete narrative of the film can be seen as follows:
Title: Confessions of a Shopaholic
Director: P.J. Hogan
City: New York
Film Stars: Rebecca Bloomwood, Luke Brandon, Suze Cleath, Graham Bloomwood and Jane Bloomwood
Actually, there were many theories that can be used to analyse a literary work, but the author decided to utilize one of Jungian theories because the author agreed that merely Jungian theory that provided a clear theory of Archetypal, which would be utile to analyse this survey.
J.1 Method of Data Collection
In the beginning, the author searched the stuffs after make up one’s minding what survey or research that would be done which is a survey of psychological attack. The following measure, the author will be roll uping the narrative and information of “ Confession of a Shopaholic Movie ” . After happening some “ Confession of a Shopaholic ” information, the author will go on to seek the theory of mourning particularly the theory which described about psychological attack that can be supported to analyse that narrative. To finish the analysis of psychological attack in making this survey, the author besides uses Jungian archetypical attack to analyse the chief character of this film.
J.2 Data Analysis
In analysing the survey particularly in explicating more about the research inquiry from the job preparation. ( James 1972, p.186 ) says that Possibilities include analysing a text like a dream, looking for symbolism and repressed significance, or developing a psychological analysis of the chief character.
The author uses psychological attack by taking Jungian Archetypal Approach for this survey. The author find the informations about the narrative of the film and Jungian Archetypal theories that are really utile to link and explicate descriptions of certain Jungian archetypal attack found in Confession of a Shopaholic Movie that influence Rebecca ‘s character development. To finish the analysis of that theory, the author searched the account of Jungian archetypical attack for this survey in the library. After the author believes that the theories is connect with the thought of this survey, the following measure is to link each theories and how does that theories wok in the chief character of the film.
Revision RM 1 and do a proposal
Revision for proposal
Examination of Thesis proposal