In the past few old ages. addition in cybercrime conducted through the Internet. has emerged as a important concern for authorities. The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. officially recorded as Republic Act No. 10175. is a jurisprudence in the Philippines approved on September 12. 2012. It aims to turn to legal issues refering on-line interactions and the Internet in the Philippines. Among the cybercrime offenses included in the measure are cybersquatting. cybersex. kid erotica. individuality larceny. illegal entree to informations and libel. Under the new act. a individual found guilty of calumniatory remarks online. including remarks made on societal webs such as Facebook and Twitter or web logs. could be fined or jailed.
The act is besides designed to forestall cybersex. defined as sexually explicit confab over the cyberspace – frequently affecting “cam girls” executing sexual Acts of the Apostless in forepart of webcams for internet clients. The Act has cosmopolitan legal power: its commissariats apply to all Filipino subjects irrespective of the topographic point of committee. Jurisdiction besides lies when a punishable act is either committed within the Philippines. whether the mistaking device is entirely or partially situated in the Philippines. or whether harm was done to any natural or juridical individual who at the clip of committee was within the Philippines.
Several requests have been submitted to the Supreme Court oppugning the constitutionality of the Act. While this jurisprudence is being discussed. many reactions has been made. Harmonizing to Senator Edgardo Angara. the chief advocate of the Act. it is a legal model to protect freedoms such as the freedom of look. However. Senator Teofisto Guingona III criticized the measure. naming it a anterior restraint to the freedom of address and freedom of look. Besides. the jurisprudence generated a figure of protests – anon. militants hacked into authorities web sites. journalists held mass meetings & A ; reactions made in the on-line community like facebook and chirrup.
Statement of the Problem
The research. The survey intended to reply these inquiries.
1. What is cybercrime jurisprudence?
2. What are its advantages & A ; disadvantages?
3. Why is it considered a hinderance to IT pupils?
Significance of the Study
The survey provided information about the Cybercrime jurisprudence.