“We must contend! I repeat it. sir. we must contend! ” Emotional and logical entreaty plays a great portion in the “Sinners in the custodies of an angry God” and the “Speech in the Virginia convention” . The emotions in both of these addresss bring them to life by the usage of repeat. rhetorical inquiries. and imagination. Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards both apply similar persuasive techniques. but they differ in the type of entreaty to their audiences.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” uses repeat. rhetorical inquiries. and imagination to make a province of terror and fright. “The cavity is prepared. the fire is made ready. the furnace is now hot. ready to have them. the fires do now ramp and glow” shows the repeat emphasizes the world feel. It leaves fright in the Black Marias of evildoers. “Who knows the power of God’s anger” ? is a rhetorical inquiry that belittles the Puritans” cognition of a vindictive God. This is another great rhetorical inquiry in this address because it leaves the audience inquiring the reply to it. Rhetorical inquiries serve as two intents ; foremost to pass on and back to carry the audience. It makes the audience see the thought with small clip to follow their ain sentiment. Jonathan Edwards asks a batch of rhetorical inquiries to merely do snake pit look worse. Edwards besides uses a batch of imagination to aim the senses. One good quotation mark he uses is “The glistening blade is whet …” This quotation mark suggests that the blade is razor crisp and ready to take its following iniquitous victim. The deepness of his imagination in Edwards address is alone and unlike any others.
In comparing to Jonathan Edward’s address. Patrick Henry’s persuasive address besides uses repeat. rhetorical inquiries and imagination to better picture his address. “…we must contend! I repeat it. sir. we must contend! ” is used in Henry’s address to show the dire demand to travel to war. “…and allow it come! I repeat it. sir. allow it come! ” is a comparing to the first quotation mark because he is stating the war can non be avoided so come Forth. Henry uses tonss of rhetorical inquiries. such as “Will it be when we are wholly disarmed. and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? ” He is proposing that will they eventually have the will to contend merely if and when British have already conquered them. One of the best rhetorical inquiries in the address ends the address on a strong note. “Is life so beloved. or peace so sweet. as to be purchased at the monetary value of ironss and bondage? ” Henry is utilizing both emotional and logical entreaty to capture the audience. Henry has a particular manner of seting imagination into his address. he does non state descriptive words. but the manner it is read. the reader gets a sense of heighten emotion throughout the address.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and the “Speech in the Virginia Convention” displayed a batch of comparing through literary devices it had contrast besides. The contrast is that each address played off of emotional and logical entreaty. “Sinners in the custodies of an Angry God” was chiefly based off emotional entreaty. Edward’s described vividly the strivings and torture you will have in snake pit. “The God that holds you over the cavity of snake pit. much as the one holds a spider. or some nauseating insect over the fire. abhors you… his wrath toward you burns like fire ; he looks upon you as worthy of nil else. but to be cast into fire. He described that you are nil in snake pit and that you will fire. “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” played largely off of the frights and emotions of the audience.
In contrast to the emotional entreaty Patrick Edward’s address. “Speech in the Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry. had more of a logical entreaty to the audience. Henry demanded that the war was on its manner and there was no manner to halt it. Henry wanted to fix the settlement for war in hopes they could perchance get the better of the British and be free of their opinions. The quote “If we wish to be free… we must contend! I repeat sir we must contend! ” shows Henry’s accent on how the war is of import. Patrick Henry based his address more on logical entreaty.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and the “Speech in the Virginia Convention” both used compared by utilizing literary devices such as repeat. rhetorical inquiry and imagination. Both addresss were based on different entreaties but both win in their ends on carrying their audience.