Ethics In Public Relations Essay Sample

August 1, 2017 Accounting

Ethical motives in the field of Public Relations Public Relations ( PR ) is a turning field today. Many people view the profession as unethical. because its end is to act upon public sentiment. Just a few unethical people can stain an image of a whole field. One of the first people to utilize PR techniques was P. T. Barnum. For illustration. he created a birth certification for a adult female who was claiming to hold been George Washington’s personal nurse. This would hold made the adult female over 160 old ages old. Peoples like P. T. Barnum contribute to the general misperception of PR as an unethical profession. If there was a codification of moralss back so it might of helped today’s perceptual experience of the field of Public Relations.

As the Public Relations field grows “the general populace is on our instance the intelligence media is on our instance even we are on our ain instance. ” ( Mivamoto 1 ) The populace as a whole is demanding higher ethical patterns from concern houses and organisations than it did in the yesteryear. Even college pupils are developing a negative temperament towards public dealingss because of the manner textbooks present it. For illustration. the P. T. Barnum narrative creative activity above shows how far person will travel to convey in a crowd. Barnum lied to the populace.

A public dealingss practitioner holds immense duties in advancing and supporting his or her employers. Mivamoto lists a few duties of public dealingss representatives in [ his address ] “Public Relations Ethical motives 201: Challenges We Just Can’t Ignore. ” Here are some of the challenges public relation professionals face: § Misleading Information: We’re counted on and trusted to supply accurate information to our populaces. It’s so easy to direct out-on intent – wrong information designed to take them astray.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

§ Promotion of Inferior Merchandises: How ethical is to advance merchandises made by our company that we know are inferior – merchandises that we know are insecure. or of hapless quality. or will be used illicitly? § Political Influence: Does money still buy influence in political relations? Should public dealingss professionals use Political Action Committees to derive influence with elected functionaries through economic support? It happens all the clip. Is it ethical? Or is it merely good concern? § Promotion of US Products: In many foreign states. American companies are advancing and selling merchandises deemed unsuitable for usage in the USA.

The immense duties and determinations come easier the longer one is in pattern. Age and experience aid professionals in doing ethical determinations. Furthermore. surveies show that female practicians are significantly more ethical than work forces. Many practicians have said that the ground why they are unethical is because of the competitory environment. Harmonizing to the article by Pratt. “some practicians blame the handiness. or lack thereof. of good. effectual function theoretical accounts. peculiarly among top concern executives. for both practicians and society in general. ” { The media is ever foregrounding the bad PR professionals when they make unethical determination. Cut THIS OR MOVE IT } Mivamoto goes on to speak about the two basic ethical systems: Deontology and teleology. Deontology is a system of duty-based moralss. which teaches. “That all actions are inherently right or incorrect. It all depends on the inner-based. self-denial of each single public dealingss practician. ” Teleology is an outcome-based system wherein ‘the terminals justify the agencies. ‘”

The illustration Mivamoto gives is “Christianity began with one adult male combating what he considered corrupt faith. Jesus Christ used what we today would name authoritative public dealingss techniques: He used the two-step flow theory of communicating. He did a batch of public visual aspects. He staged particular events. He identified and targeted specific audiences. and He adapted His message to each audience. In the instance of Christianity. did the terminals justify the agencies? ” ( Mivamoto 3 ) Any profession might analyze itself to find what actions would better its public image. Public Relations professionals have done this and proposed many statements on how to better the field. Mivamoto suggests that we make certain the organisation we serve understands ethical behaviour and that we communicate moralss clearly to everyone associated with the organisation. He besides proposes PR representatives would better the field by belonging to professional organisations. like Public Relations Society of America ( PRSA ) .

Members of professional organisations are more likely to stay by their codification of moralss for fright of ejection. However. the PRSA web site says that merely. “roughly 10 per centum of the estimated 15. 700 public dealingss professionals in the US are members of PRSA. ” Some ethicians think that there should be a codification of moralss for public dealingss like the codification for accounting. For illustration. PRSA has its ain codification of moralss. The PRSA codification consists of 17 articles “dealing with fairness toward clients. employers. and the populace ; with knowing communicating of false or deceptive information ; and with prosecuting in patterns that corrupt the channels of communicating of procedures of authorities. ” ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www. prsa. org )

If a member of PRSA violates the codification or is suspected of making something unethical the organization’s Board of Ethical and Professional Standards investigates the member. The member can be suspended. expelled. or reprimanded. However. since rank is optional. ejection or suspension does non ache a member’s calling. He/she merely looks bad within PRSA. However. if ranks were compulsory and the codification of moralss were cosmopolitan the PRSA could make a better occupation of stoping an unethical member’s calling rapidly.

Kruckeberg claims that a “universal codification would be nonmeaningful due to the deficiency of legal power to implement ethical behaviour. ” If it were compulsory for all PR practicians to belong to an organisation like PRSA. it would be easier to implement a codification of moralss. because it would be easier to enforce terrible punishments on those who violate and tarnish PR images.

Hunt and Tirpok suggest “that the best ways to travel the field toward consideration of a cosmopolitan moralss codification would be for person to outline such a codification that would be generic plenty to cover the assorted activities that public dealingss entails. every bit good as globally-different ethical criterions. ” Once there is an cosmopolitan codification in set. the public might get down seeing a better side of the PR profession. If it weren’t for PR. the universe merely wouldn’t be the same. PR practicians need to work on bettering their image by utilizing ethical judgement alternatively of listening to employers or co-workers who urge them to move unethically. It is easier to populate with oneself when one is non responsible for killing 1000000s by doing an unethical determination. Therefore. to be an ethical public dealingss practician. one should ever inquire oneself “Can I give my ain personal values for the client. for my employer. for my profession. or for society? ”

Plants Cited

Hunt. Todd. and Andrew Tirpok. Universal Ethics Code: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. Public Relations Review Spring ( 1993 ) : 1-10.

Kruckeberg. Dean. Universal Ethics Code: Both Possible and Feasible.

Public Relations Review Spring ( 1993 ) : 2130.

Mivamoto. Craig. Public Relations Ethical motives 201: Challenges We Just Can’t Ignore. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. geocities. com/wallstreet/8925/ethics. htm.

Pratt. Cornelius B. PRSA Members Perceptions of Public Relations Ethics.

Public Relations Review Summer ( 1991 ) : 145-159.


I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out