Harley-Davidson Motor Company: Enterprise Software Selection Essay Sample

August 3, 2017 Architecture

1. See Exhibit 10 on page 22 of the instance ; does it include the factors you consider most of import in the choice procedure? Which factors would you be inclined to burden most to a great extent?

Quantitative Standards

1. Design and Foundation

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

2. Request Definition

3. Documentation

4. Receiving

5. Supply Management

6. Undertaking Tracking

7. Assorted

8. Interfaces

9. Training

10. Other

Yes. It does include the factors which we consider most of import.

Out of these factors. Supply Management. Undertaking Tracking and Receiving are the nucleus functionalities which are anyhow required. Design and Foundation. Documentation and Request Definition are the supporting demands which add value and heighten the quality of service or functionality.

Therefore our group would wish to split the whole list of quantitative factors into 4 separate groups:

Group 1: Core Functionality

Receiving. Supply Management. Undertaking Tracking

Group 2: Supporting Functionality

Training. Interfaces

Group 3: Value adding functionalities

Documentation. Design and Foundation. Request Definition

Group 4: Others

Miscellaneous. Other

Enhancement

We would besides wish to add some more factors viz:

Group 1: Core Functionality

Receiving. Supply Management. Undertaking Tracking. Customer Relationships. Business Intelligence

Group 2: Supporting Functionality

Training. Interfaces. Real clip support

Group 3: Value adding functionalities

Documentation. Design and Foundation. Request Definition. User Friendliness. Knowledge Management

Group 4: Others

Miscellaneous. Other

Qualitative Standards

1. Long term relationship potency

2. Research and Development

3. Training attack

4. Implementation/Education/Change Management Methodology

5. Understanding Harley? s demand

6. Enabling the SMS

7. Out of the box tantrum

8. Fiscal Viability

9. Cost

10. Technical Support Offers

11. Overall functionality

12. Number of spouses included in Solution Proposal

13. Architecture Compatibility

14. Platform Portability

15. Web functionality? to travel?

16. Manufacturing Experience

This list excessively covers the most of import factors.

Dividing this list into groups:

Group 1: Relationship and Understanding

Long term relationship potency. Understanding Harley? s demand

Group 2: Experience and Fitness

Enabling the SMS. Financial Viability. Cost. Technical Support Offerings. Overall functionality. Architecture Compatibility. Platform Portability. Web functionality? to travel? . Manufacturing Experience. Training attack

Group 3: Invention and Change Management

Research and Development. Implementation/Education/Change Management Methodology. Out of the box tantrum. Number of spouses included in Solution Proposal

Enhancement

The listing can be enhanced as:

Group 1: Relationship and Understanding

Long term relationship potency. Understanding Harley? s demand

Group 2: Experience and Fitness

Enabling the SMS. Financial Viability. Cost. Technical Support Offerings. Overall functionality. Architecture Compatibility. Platform Portability. Web functionality? to travel? . Manufacturing Experience. Training attack

Group 3: Invention and Change Management

Research and Development. Implementation/Education/Change Management Methodology. Out of the box tantrum. Number of spouses included in Solution Proposal

Group 4: Standing

Soft issues. Market standing. People compatibility. Previous Customer Feedback

2. Based on the information in the instance. which supplier would you choose ( and why ) ? Argue in favour of and against each seller before geting at the concluding determination?

Arguments:

Supplier 1:

+ ve: High on Functionality. Change direction and Cultural compatibility

– ve: none

Supplier 2:

+ ve: High on functionality

– ve: Low on cultural compatibility. hazard of it being merely a typical gross revenues pitch

Supplier 3:

+ ve: Have engagement with the company. good functionality

_ ve: Poor show and strong belief. non outstanding

Change direction is a really of import factor in altering times. Harley Davidson is non traveling to lodge to present procedures or engineerings. Similarly cultural compatibility is highly of import. Even best package bundles can neglect if the people compatibility is non at that place. Half of apprehension is completed when there is cultural compatibility. Besides. communicating spreads are minimized.

Having old battles should non be adhering. Similarly the scenario should be looked past the presentation and the? Genuineness? should be given weightage.

On the footing of this. we would choose Provider 1.

3. What is your overall appraisal of Harley? s attack to enterprise package choice? What ( if anything ) would you hold done otherwise?

Enterprise Software Selection

Assessment parametric quantity 1:

There should be engagement of the people in determination devising who are really traveling to utilize the package or those who will acquire affected by the package

Assessment parametric quantity 2:

The company should itself make an analysis of the procedure and internal facets of the demand

Assessment parametric quantity 3:

Survey of the environment and other execution instances

The Harley? s attack towards Enterprise Software Selection was first-class in
parametric quantity 1 and 2. But it was missing in parametric quantity 3.

While looking indoors and towards the providers. Harley needed to hold a expression into the present and hereafter of industry excessively. It should hold looked into the execution of such package in other organisations and their experiences. Besides. the tendency in the industry is to be studied with respect to the procedures. What if by the clip package is implemented in Harley. the procedures in industry alterations? What if some other bike company or any other fabrication company had tried associating client relationships in the system and was successful?

Similarly. Harley wholly neglected the extra functionalities which they do non necessitate now but might necessitate in future. They drew a boundary around the demand and made it stiff. Thus it lacked the vision of future upgradation or fut6ure demands.

Therefore if the parametric quantity of industry instance analysis and future vision is included in this attack so it becomes complete.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out