Homosexuals: Are They Biologically Constructed Essay

September 25, 2017 Cultural

One thing that psychological surveies have been able to turn out and set up concern is the differences in our behavioural attitudes. There are fluctuations in the manner we think. act. and in what we believe in. In recent times. assorted researches have been carried out with the purpose of finding what accounts for these fluctuations. In such a research. a controversial issue is chosen and surveies are made on it. One of the issues that captured the involvement of these research workers is homosexualism. By definition. homosexualism is the sexual orientation displayed by a individual toward another individual of the same sex.

Many people might believe that this signifier of sexual attitude is a recent development in our universe today. but it might be interesting to cognize that such is besides apparent in the yesteryear. Recently. much media attending has focused on the inquiry of what causes some people to go homosexual and has been heatedly debated and studied of all time since. In this essay. focal point will be drawn on the assorted places whether homophiles are born or made. In the following paragraphs we can see the argument over the familial trait of homosexualism by professional people and organisations.

The people who support the familial trait argue utilizing scientific surveies affecting human encephalon activities and human pheromones alternatively of merely looking at the homosexual detonation. It has besides been argued that the ground why people think it is learned is chiefly due to spiritual. cultural. and educational factors. They believe that homosexualism is inherited. like skin colour. oculus colour. and other physical factors. They believe that people are going more receptive to the rights of homophiles. There are people who strongly oppose familial homosexualism.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

They point out that the familial factor is yet to be determined and the homosexual rights militants and the popular media are responsible for giving uncomplete and irrelevant thoughts to the populace. They think that the American society is accepting homsexuality because the heads of immature coevals lack a moral compass. In “People Do Not Choose Their Sexual Orientation. ” John Corvino states that sexual orientation is non a pick. From his personal experience he says that he ne’er turned down his “straight lesson” as a kid. or ne’er take to “become homosexual.

Furthermore he states that homosexualism is a deep. of import. and comparatively fixed characteristic of human personality. Corvino cites that there are many unwanted traits that are genetically influenced. This includes alcohol addiction. force. homosexualism. Last. he says that homosexualism does non hold any bad effects whereas alcohol addiction does ( Corvino. 2007 ) . Stefan Lovgren. in his “Sexuality May Be Biological. ” provinces that homosexualism is wholly expected from the human genetic sciences. He besides states that it is merely controversial because of the societal and political contentions over it.

He thinks that homosexualism is due to familial factors utilizing two accounts: the generative behaviour and biological account ( Lovgren. 2007 ) . Lovgren shows an experiment conducted on heterosexual work forces and adult females and homosexual work forces in 2005 to happen if homosexualism is genetically based. The survey was published on May 10. 2005 in the research diary Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences. In the survey they exposed heterosexual work forces and adult females and homosexual work forces to chemicals found in male and female sex endocrine and found that the encephalons of homosexual work forces respond like adult females encephalons when they smelled male perspiration ( cited in Lovgren. 2007 ) .

Lovgren argues that. “people are born – non bred – gay” ( Lovgren. 2007 ) . He besides cited another survey to uncover the difference in the encephalon activity of homosexual and consecutive work forces. conducted by Swedish research workers. The survey revealed differences in the encephalon activity of heterosexual and homosexual work forces to the same olfactory properties. Harmonizing to Lovegren. the survey emphasizes the statement that homosexualism is familial. non acquired ( Lovgren. 2007 ) .

In the article. “Americans Have Become More Accepting of Homosexuality. ” Jeni Loftus states that the past 20 old ages has witnessed a drastic alteration in the general attitude of people towards homosexualism. It has been alleged that in the recent old ages that Americans have been more broad in their attitude towards homophiles and homosexualism in general ( Loftus. 2001 ) . The grounds for this can be accounted from two different positions: the altering demographic make-up of the population and the displacement in the political orientations of the people of America.

Loftus states that the demographic make-up explains the addition in degree of instruction has made people more flexible and broad in their attitudes towards homosexualism while the cultural ideological displacement explains how more people are broad in their attitude fundamentally because of the alterations in personal belief system about gender by and large ( Loftus 2001 ) . Besides. this alteration in attitude has had an indirect consequence on how homophiles are being viewed in American society. She states that negative displacement in attitudes emerges from those who are older. less educated. spiritual. and colored ( Loftus. 2001 ) .

However. Jeffrey Santinover in another article. “Homosexuality Is Caused by Societal Dysfunction. ” claimed that homosexualism is simply a manner of digesting the consequence of a negative influence in a modern society. He argues that homosexualism should be seen as a moral and religious illness and that homophiles have the ability to alter ( Santinover. 2002 ) . He believes that they can atleast alteration to straight persons. In his paper. he asserted that homosexualism is merely a agency of indulging in an abnormalcy caused by deficiency of morality.

Santinover thinks that the recent statistic about the altering sentiment of people towards homosexualism is affected by political force per unit areas and that people have substituted truth to political force per unit area in America. For one. late there have been several runs made by sexual right militants and these have allowed America to lose its moral compass on gender. He believes that most people say a morally hideous act is all right because in the existent sense. cipher really knows what is truly right and incorrect ( Santinover. 2002 ) . Much attending is given to rights and freedom while we forget to look into if such actions are truly right in themselves.

For Santinover. immature people now have entree to several illicit stuffs that are perverting their heads. The consequence of this is a morally ill state with instances of abnormalcies in action and belief systems ( Santinover. 2002 ) . And for him. this causes homosexualism because they do non see a ground why they should non seek it out and cipher is speaking because there is the prevailing fright that the rights and freedom of such people will be infringed. He besides points out that the people who claim that homosexualism is normal have non considered the familial factors.

He asked if there was some signifier of familial influence that causes homosexualism and what is in the familial codification that differentiates homophiles from others ( Santinover. 2002 ) . He used a hoops participant as an illustration. Basketball participants do non hold a specific familial status that makes them play the game but have familial influences that cause them to play the game. Such intermediated traits include tallness. strenuosity. and the likes. This does non intend that they are born to be hoops participants. In add-on to this. Santinover gave illustrations of homophiles that he has met that were under therapy.

He informed of their battle for credence. They were under an emotional coop where they have to contend for conformance ( Santinover. 2002 ) . One might believe that this is victimhood but the truth is nobody battles who they are and of all time succeeds. He besides states that this was a pick that was made and can be reversed with clip and therapy. The article. “There Is No Evidence that Homosexualilty Is Genetic. ” published by National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuals ( NARTH ) . provinces that. “genetic and unchangeable theory has been promoted by homosexual and popular media.

There is no grounds that homosexualism is merely “genetic” ( NARTH. 2007 ) . It besides states that the researchers’ public statements to the imperativeness are frequently far-reaching but they are talking carefully to scientific community. Harmonizing to NARTH. homosexualism can non be inherited like physical characteristics and the qualities that the homophiles inherit are anxiousness. shyness. sensitiveness. and aesthetic abilities non homosexual cistrons ( NARTH. 2007 ) . The cheery militants have been forcing for the civil rights of homophiles. However. they have non considered the tolerance and credence given already by the general society.

Digesting homosexualism is different from O.K.ing or accepting homophiles. Majority of the sentiments that Americans hold about homosexualism are due to h heir tolerance and regard towards homophiles. as a human being. I believe homosexualism is a pick and the wickedness is enfeebling. but homophiles are in demand of attending and aid. We are to digest them and see them as our fellow being. but ne’er accept homosexualism. All people are valuable and they should be given love and attending without favoritism.

Homosexuality will still be a contoversial issue that raises concern in our society. There will still be instances of favoritism against them. but whatever place we hold. what we should recognize is that we are all members of the same society. We must work with each other to do our society a better topographic point. We should digest and assist people who do non hold the same sexual orientation as we do and we need to understand that they excessively have something to lend to the development of our society. Event though we have different positions about life. we are all human existences created by the same God.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out