Is Caribbean Civilization Based on the Truth? Essay

September 16, 2017 Anthropology

Caribbean Civilisation is non based on the truth. Historians gave us thoughts about the history of Caribbean Civilisation and civilization which were the prejudice of historical history. These thoughts came to us via books or through unwritten history in narratives and vocals. The Cambridge Online Dictionary refers to civilisation as “human society with its well-developed societal administration. or the cultural and manner of life of a society or state at a peculiar period in clip. ” Truth is the creative activity of human interaction and is based on our beliefs.

It gave us a sense of legitimacy and a beginning of belief constructions whereas revisionism gave new versions of the region’s history based on more elaborate penetrations and grounds. Historians collected the facts about the Caribbean part which were made into a narrative or narrative for everyone to understand. The significances of the narrative were put together by people stating the narrative which led to the prejudice of historical history. The prejudice of historical history was as a consequence of human factors such as gender. sex. age. nationality. category. faith. instruction and economic systems.

The Europeans for illustration. geting in the part in 1492. saw the country as an barbarian 1 with no civilization. This thought was incorrect as it was written merely from a male position. As a consequence. present twenty-four hours historiographers are actively engaged in get the better ofing much of the prejudices of the earliest recorded histories of the Caribbean. It is unscientific to believe written narratives about Caribbean Civilization without significant grounds. The first Caribbean narrative was written by non-Caribbean people.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

These historiographers wrote about what they knew from written groundss but what was written can non be proven to be a factual unless there is archeological or familial grounds to turn out it. No 1 will compose or state anything unscrupulous about him or herself. Historians were composing about the history but were non alive to witness the facts. The historian weaved a narration of the past into a sequence that makes sense. As historian Becker points out. historiographers gave society an “artificial extension of societal memory.

”This unreal extension became a corporate experience as the full society so portions these memories. ‘Carib’ Cannibalism was a myth which was put frontward by the Europeans to warrant their devastation of the native people who resisted them. Caribbean historians no longer see the term “Carib” as a valid 1. Revisionism is the procedure by which historiographers gave new versions of the region’s history based on more elaborate penetrations and grounds. By proving the narratives. the early

androcentric and Europocentric focal point of the Caribbean is being changed. ‘History’ is perspective driven and capable to alter based on the available grounds. The usage of tools of other scientific disciplines and subjects such as archeology. linguistics. forensic scientific disciplines. anthropology. societal scientific disciplines and natural scientific disciplines proves that Caribbean Civilisation was non based on the truth. History today is going more accurate as the tools of academe allow us to get the better of many of the initial prejudices of the early historiographers.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out