Egoism is a teleological theory of moralss that sets as its end the benefit. pleasance. or greatest good of the oneself entirely.
Ethical egoism is the normative ethical place that moral agents ought to make what is in their ain opportunism. It is of import to separate this from psychological egoism. the claim that people can merely move in their ain involvement. Any act. no affair how selfless it might look. is really motivated by some selfish desire of the agentEthical Egoism: The individual thinks It is morally right to hold “Same Sex marriage” . because it is their ain best involvement. . so the individual chooses to make what they think is right to make.
But in Psychological moralss: Same-Sex matrimony is right because it claims that worlds by nature are motivated merely by self-interest. So no affair what is the action. it is motivated by some selfish desire of the individual.
Peoples choose to be gay/lesbian because they think they are born to be gay/lesbian and because this is their self involvement.
In the same clip it is immoral because it is against the nature of matrimony. Because the word ‘marriage’ means merely a legal brotherhood between one adult male and one adult female as hubby and married woman. and the word ‘spouse’ refers merely to a individual of the opposite sex who is a hubby or a married woman.
Where in the other manus. Utilitarianism is. Greatest Happiness Principle: …actions are right in proportion as they tend to advance felicity. incorrect as they tend to bring forth the contrary of felicity. . so It is morally right be gay/lesbian because it produces the greatest pleasance.
Same sex matrimony could be immoral because it is against God’s will. and reproduction is an indispensable component of matrimony. .
Arguments over terminologyProponents of same-sex matrimony frequently use the term “equal marriage” to emphasize that they seek equality as opposed to particular rights ; [ 1 ] the term “equal marriage” has besides been used by women’s rightists to depict any matrimony. regardless of the sex of the spouses. in which the spouses have equal position within the matrimony. [ 2 ] Opponents argue that comparing same-sex and opposite-sex matrimony changes the significance of matrimony and its traditions. [ 3 ] Some oppositions use the term “homosexual marriage” . and studies have suggested that the word “homosexual” is more stigmatising than the word “gay” . [ 4 ] Some publications that oppose same-sex matrimony put the word matrimony in panic quotation marks when mentioning to it. One noteworthy publication that patterns this is The Washington Times. Cliff Kincaid. a author for the conservative American media watchdog group Accuracy in Media. agrees with this method. reasoning that “marriage” is a word that same-sex twosomes simply want to use to themselves. but have no legal ability to make so in most provinces. [ 5 ]
Same-sex matrimony protagonists argue that it is editorialising and connoting lower status. and indicate out that the quotation marks are even used when mentioning to same-sex matrimonies in locations where such brotherhoods are legal. [ 6 ] Some have suggested reserving the word “marriage” for spiritual contexts. and in civil and legal contexts utilizing a unvarying construct of civil brotherhoods. Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz. for case. wrote that such an agreement would “strengthen the wall of separation between church and province by puting a sacred establishment wholly in the custodies of the church while puting a secular establishment under province control. ” [ 7 ] Marriage advocates find such a suggestion impractical.
“Why do we all of a sudden have to throw out the full system. contrive some whole new thing. merely because cheery people want to acquire married? ” . asks Evan Wolfson of Freedom to Marry. “I don’t really see Alan Dershowitz making anything about this. other than composing an article. because he likely justly understands it would be an huge undertaking to travel around the state and convince 200 million plus people to merchandise in their matrimony for something new and explain why we are making this when we really have a legal system that already clearly distinguishes between civil and spiritual matrimony. ” [ 8 ] Conservative critics like National Review’s Jennifer Morse contend that the conflation of matrimony with contractual understandings is itself a menace to marriage that “has undermined more heterosexual matrimonies than anything. with the possible exclusion of adultery” . [ 9 ] However. in the instance of one province in which same-sex matrimonies are recognized. Massachusetts. there is a long history of matrimony being regarded as strictly a civil establishment. as illustrated in Governor William Bradford’s history Of Plymouth Plantation: hypertext transfer protocol: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage