Study On Vodafone And Agency Problems Finance Essay

October 3, 2017 February 4th, 2019 Media

Directors are non the existent proprietors of the companies and proprietors are non the existent directors of the companies. However, Directors are appointed by the proprietors i.e. by the stockholders to take attention of companys public presentation for the proprietors benefit, but sometimes directors take some determinations for their ain interest without holding visible radiation on the proprietor ‘s value. This construct is called an ‘Agency Problem ‘ . This job is by and large faced by all the companies these yearss. Executive compensations bundles attract the public attending and media involvement. The major event was when Vodafone declare in its one-year study in 2000 and 2001 that Vodafone ‘s CEO Chris Gent, awarded with ?8 million as a salary bundle ( Annual Report Vodafone, 2000 ) . This all happens after house Vodafone coup d’etat German mobile phone group Mannesmann and Air Touch. After such coup d’etats and amalgamations Vodafone underwent major managerial alterations ; this chiefly because harmonizing to Guest, P ( 2006 ) “ correlativity between the compensation and size imply that doing a house larger by acquisition could merely increase the compensation of an bing directors, irrespective of whether the acquisition creates value or non ” . Therefore bulk of acquisition, amalgamations do non profit to stockholders but these acquisition and amalgamations are fundamentally carried out to increase the size of the house in an effort to increase executive compensation ( Guest, P 2006 ) .

There is important relationship between house public presentation and the degree of executive hard currency compensation. In Vodafone, CEO compensation consist of cash- based compensation, which is the amount of base wage and fillip and equity-based compensation, that is the amount of stock options and long term/short term inducements programs ( Ozken, N 2007 ) . Harmonizing to the Vodafone one-year study of 2000, the short term inducement programs is provided in signifier of portions, after achieving public presentation standards for the twelvemonth as set by the wage commission. This probationary award of portion is in two parts: “ an original award of “ Initial Shares ” worth up to 25 % of salary and an extra award of “ Enhancement Shares ” , deserving 50 % of the value of the original award ” ( Vodafone Annual Report 2000 ) . But if executives do non desire to travel for probationary awards so, the company may pay a hard currency fillip of 25 % of salary. While in Long Term inducement program portions will be transferred to the executive managers and senior executives at nil consideration after achieving three old ages public presentation standards, set by the wage commission.

The size of the Vodafone has no uncertainty increased by the Acquisition of Air Touch and Mannesmann, but this acquisition did n’t profit any Vodafone stockholder. Vodafone increased its size by $ 184 billion but because of acquisitions and amalgamations it destroyed about $ 105 billion wealth of an investors ( Andrew, 2002 ) . So it is right said “ Company had immensely overpaid for the many acquisitions it had made in anterior old ages, many with hyperbolic stock ” ( PR Newswire, 2002 ) . There were two occasions where company awarded particular fillip to executives. First when company merged with the Air Touch in 1999 and secondly when company acquired Mannesmann AG in 2000. Company policy does non let for the payment of particular fillips to executives but these fillips are paid, on the other manus it paid for acquisitions, which really cut down the value of stockholders money ( Vodafone Annual Report, 2000 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

After taking supra maintained bureau job into consideration, the chief focal point of Vodafone ‘s is on the involvement of executive and directors at the same time with the involvement of stockholders. For this intent, company holding a policy where they offer compensation to executives in signifier of stock option on the footing of accomplishing public presentation mark which fundamentally improve the stockholder value. “ Share Ownership guidelines require ownership degrees of four and three times salary severally for the Chief Executive and other executive managers ” ( Vodafone Group Plc, 2001 ) . Furthermore, out of entire wage, 80 % are public presentation based wage. The above reference issue explains that the stockholders ever in benefit with the public presentation based wage. To claim more wage, the executives would hold to increase the public presentation. But, the chief thing is that which public presentation we have to see. Either simple public presentation or hazard based public presentation. Performance can be increase by utilizing different methods. To increase the public presentation, low cost debt is the simple solution. Besides, the hazard of the company increases with the addition in purchase. Furthermore, as higher the debt the lower will be the equity of the company.

In 2000 and 2001 there was no liability in the Vodafone because of amalgamations and acquisitions increased the value of equity capital. Vodafone ‘s 31 March 2001 balance sheet shows net debt at 5.4 % of the Group market capitalisation ( Vodafone Group Plc, 2001 ) . By and large when a new CEO ‘s articulation the company, the first thing a Chief executive officer does is to compose off all the assets, to take of future net incomes. But, in instance of Vodafone, there was a instance of public presentation based wage, so deliberately the CEO non composing off its company ‘s assets as because composing off assets would cut down the hereafter net incomes and CEO ‘s are paid on public presentation based wage. But this give a inquiries in stockholders eyes that the company might be overvalued. The ground of overvalued is the assets might non be deserving plenty that what they are demoing in the balance sheet. Furthermore, in the twelvemonth 2000 and 2001 Vodafone Group amortised ?1.72 and ?11.9 billion of good will severally. This amorisation sum is all portion of the good will sum which has been created at the clip of the amalgamation of Air Touch. At the clip Air Touch amalgamation ?41 billion of good will has been created. However, amortisation of good will consequences in the decrease of assets of the company which contrary agencies decrease in proprietor ‘s equity.

Due to compose down of assets i.e. good will there is lessening in assets and with an addition in a liability, will decidedly cut down the value of stockholders money, in general cut down proprietor ‘s equity. Same thing was at that place in the Vodafone instance. Valuation intent besides affects the value of the company. But, the existent rating of the company would be reduced by the write down away assets and besides because of heavy liability. In the instance of Vodafone, the heavy liability ca n’t be step but yes, compose off of assets i.e. compose off of good will would decidedly impact the rating of the company. This will non merely impact the rating of the company but it besides gives an thought that the company over paid for the acquisition. And these all give rise in all the bureau jobs as because executives and directors are extremely rewarded at the clip of these trades.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out