In her missive wirtten in response to an American adult female. Marian Evans Lewes utilizes an array of rhetorical schemes to convey her belief that the development of a author is an ongoin procedure which is pressed on by “some force. ” Alternatively of holding a condescending tone. Lewes puts herself on the same degree as the adult female. taking a pathological path in turn toing the adult female. By utilizing words such as “us” and “we” . Lewes sympathizes with the adult female and reassures her that she has been in the same place.
This sympathetic attack non merely informs the adult female that what she is goin through is normal. but it lets her realize that no affair what position ; well-known novelist or unknown adult female ; everyone goes through hard times. and “the merely hope is to seek and unify the extreme activity with the extreme surrender. ” Supporting this pathological path. Lewes utilizes first-person enriched sentence structure to light her experiences and her beliefs on the developmental procedure of the reader.
By saying how she “began composing [ works ] with no great glorification at all” and so flourished into the reknowened novelist she is now provides penetration to the adult female that. rather honestly. you go to get down someplace. This gives the adult female “hope” . which is a necessity to all authors. Furthermore. Lewes uses chronological sentence structure to light that the development of a author is ideed a clip devouring affair.
Stating the she “entered [ with ] struggles” . the “began writing” and the wrote “ficiton which has been thought a great trade of” conveys her belief that the development of a author is non a mere nightlong go oning. but is a long. drawn-out procedure. In her response to Melusia Fay Pierce. Marian Evans Lewes illuminates the fact that the development of a wirter is non passing. but. merely like her synatax. chronological. and clip consuming. and to be successful. on must hold “hope” .