Blindly following tradition is something to fear in today’s society. Shirley Jackson’s short narrative. “The Lottery. ” is an ideal representation of this subject because a citizen of their small town is sacrificed each twelvemonth to be the lottery’s “winner. ” and that victor is stoned to decease. Comparably. in Suzanne Collins’ movie The Hunger Games. a similar lottery is drawn each twelvemonth where 24 citizens of Panem must contend to the decease to accomplish the country’s “winner. ” The citizens of both the small town and Panem have been programmed to understand that this tradition will happen and that it is ethical. when it most surely is non. The relationship between the two texts is exemplified by the usage of agony as amusement. arbitrary of mistreatment. every bit good as unconsciously leting society to hold so much power to a point where it becomes unethical.
The decease of another individual by and large has a negative association with it. nevertheless. in “The Lottery” and The Hunger Games. it is abnormally diverting. In “The Lottery. ” the lottery itself is considered to be among the other entertaining events in the small town. “The Lottery was conducted– as were the square dances. the adolescent nine. the Halloween program– by Mr. Summers. who had clip and energy to give to civic activities. ” Jackson described ( Jackson 1 ) . A human being is stoned to decease at each lottery. and it is someway categorized with square dancing and Halloween. The text implies that the small town society thinks of it as another entertaining event because that is all they’ve of all time known. when they are really being entertained by something shocking. Likewise. in The Hunger Games. the host. Effie Trinket. has a really optimistic attitude towards the game that kills 23 civilians. During the reaping. which is basically “the lottery” of the Hunger Games. she greets everyone as if it is the best clip of the twelvemonth.
She announces in her really buoyant and high pitched voice. “Welcome. welcome. welcome! Before we begin. we have a really particular movie for you. brought to you all the manner from the Capitol. The clip has come to choose one brave immature adult male and adult female for the award of stand foring District 12 in the 74th one-year Hunger Games! ” ( The Hunger Games ) Effie’s enthusiasm is representative of the authorities. and even other civilians of Panem. and how they view the Hunger Games as being advantageous and opportune. She is about to name out the names of two people who will more than probably dice in an sphere all because they got luckless and she sees it as a great thing. Both the reaping and the lottery are viewed by civilians as gratifying events. when in actuality they are put to deathing person entirely based on fortune.
The individual chosen to be executed is at random in both texts. and the individual who’s name is drawn is non guilty of anything other than bad fortune. A known phrase in Panem during the times of the Hunger Games is “May the odds be of all time in your favour. ” ( The Hunger Games ) It is televised and said at every reaping. Ironically. when the authorities uses the phrase. “your favor” would imply viing in the games and contending to the decease. whereas “your favor” to the civilians of District 12. would intend that you are free from viing for another twelvemonth. In “The Lottery. ” none of the villagers think twice about the lottery. They understand that each household member has an equal opportunity of being chosen and accepts it. until they are the 1s being stoned to decease.
Tessie. a popular homemaker and “winner” of the lottery. claims that her destiny is unjust when she draws a black point despite the fact that she has participated in legion lotteries before and ne’er mentioned it being unethical. “’Be a good athletics Tessie. ’ Mrs. Delacroix called. and Mrs. Graves said. ‘All of us took the same opportunity. ’” ( Jackson 4 ) Mrs. Graves and Mrs. Delacroix are Tessie’s fellow civilians and they rapidly turned on her merely because she was indiscriminately selected to be persecuted. The randomness of slaying in both texts is obviously unethical. nevertheless. the civilians and authorities of both the small town and Panem are blinded by society and believe that the random choice is just.
After traditions go on long plenty. there seems no demand to alter ; and that is precisely what happens in “The Lottery” and The Hunger Games. Characters in both texts are both badly blinded by society and see no ground to halt their tradition. Ritual slaying has become portion of their modus operandi and they act like it isn’t a large trade at all. In “The Lottery. ” as Mr. Summers is get downing the drawings. he says “Well now. conjecture we better get started. acquire this over with. so’s we can travel back to work. ” ( Jackson 1 ) His pick of enunciation is excessively laid back for a ceremonial of slaying. These people. who have merely returned from work. easy kill person simply because they are told to. and they will return to work after as if it ne’er happened. There is no account for this other than the fact that there has ever been a lottery. They act as if it is no large trade at all when in actuality a decease is happening. Correspondingly. in The Hunger Games. after Katniss Everdeen and Peetah Melark are chosen as the “winners” of District 12. they meet with a old master of the games. Haymitch. who has little to no advice about how to travel about the games.
He tells them to “embrace the chance of your at hand death… and cognize there is nil I can make to salvage you. ” ( The Hunger Games ) Katniss and Peetah are wholly taken back by this and at that point. are forced to accept decease. Person who is purportedly a usher on how to win the games basically tells them that there is no opportunity and to give up. The repose of his voice indicates that he does non see the games as a large trade and it does non trouble oneself him at all that the two people he is suppose to be assisting don’t have a opportunity to win the games. The sloppiness portrayed in both texts proves that society has excessively much control over these civilians. They are willing to hold highly unethical and eccentric life styles because that is all they’ve of all time known.
The surfeit of social power is illustrated both Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” and Suzanne Colin’s movie The Hunger Games. Characters in both texts are both willing to give up their rights merely because of traditions and what they have been programmed to cognize. They are entertained by indiscriminately oppressing guiltless citizens that become guilty entirely based on their bad fortune. Murdering people based on tradition is non humanist. Both the reaping and the lottery could be considered utmost illustrations of what could really go on in our society if the authorities is given excessively much power. Following Torahs and traditions can finally be taken excessively far if they are non inquiries by citizens.