The Differences Between Civil And Criminal Law Law Essay

October 3, 2017 Law

This assignment will see the differences in Civil and Criminal jurisprudence. It will explicate the functions of canvassers, Barristers, Judges and Magistrates. It will besides critically look at the characteristics of the European Court of Human Rights

4Civil jurisprudence is a private settles affairs between two persons and administrations. It still has the Roman criterion in many states because it was originated from the Roman jurisprudence. The terminal consequence is largely amendss in civil jurisprudence. Example of civil instances includes Donoghue V Stevenson [ 1993 ] where Donoghue sued Stevenson for amendss of ?500 for imbibing contaminated ginger beer which had negative consequence on his wellness, Millar V Taylor ( 17690 ) is another illustration of civil instance

5Criminal jurisprudence considers offenses committed against the Crown ( R ) .[ 6 ]“ Government identifies and criminalises behaviour that is considered incorrect, damaging to persons through condemnable jurisprudence ” Jacqueline Martin and Chris Turner define offense as[ 7 ]a behavior forbidden by the province. when a behavior is regarded by the province as being condemnable, there is ever a penalty attached to it ” . i.e. slaying and larceny. Example of condemnable instance includes R V Wilson ( 1994 ) and R v Brown ( 1991 ) where R stands for the Crown or the State. Criminal jurisprudence was made to protect administrations, persons, the society and their belongingss. They are besides made to penalize wrongdoers. The purpose of condemning wrongdoers besides include reparation, incapacitation, disincentive and reformation

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now


Condemnable jurisprudence is drafted by the authorities. It is made by the Crown ( R ) and passed by Parliament before it goes to the sovereign for “ rubber-stumping ” as jurisprudence. ( This procedure is known as ‘Royal Assent ‘ ) . Wrongdoers are prosecuted by the Crown when they commit offenses against citizens. It is the responsibility of the constabulary to implement the jurisprudence.

8Civil jurisprudence applies to the principals of common jurisprudence but in civil actions unlike condemnable proceedings, the Crown takes no sides. The crown supplies the tribunal, the justice and if necessary the enforcement of the justice ‘s opinions.


9Criminal jurisprudence punishes guilty suspect by either captivity in a captive. There are besides all right paid to the authorities in exceeding instances. Community service could be the penalty on wrongdoers depending on the type of offense committed. Contrary to condemnable jurisprudence, suspect in civil jurisprudence is non imprisoned when found apt but reimburse the claimant for losingss by the suspects act.

Burden of cogent evidence

In condemnable jurisprudence, one can ne’er be guilty without “ proven 99 per centum guilty beyond sensible uncertainty “ as per Lord Denning. When one feels that the offense committed is done due to his or her insanity, so the load lies on the suspect to turn out it. The Crown has the right to penalize condemnable wrongdoers because all offenses are against the province. For illustration, if one commits the offense of burglary by interrupting into a house and bargain, the province will prosecute the wrongdoer when even the victim brings private proceedings against the burglar.

In civil jurisprudence, the load of cogent evidence is ab initio on the claimant. There are a figure of factors which could do the load displacement to the claimant. For illustration, the suspect in a Prima facie instance will hold to rebut the claimants apparent. Lord Denning said “ there should be51 percent balance of chance in civil instances to be a victor.

Court Hierarchy

The Higher tribunals determinations bind all lower tribunal in the tribunal hierarchy.[ 10 ]The house of Godhead ( now the Supreme Court in the UK ) was bound by its ain determinations until 1966 when the pattern statement was issued by Lord Gardiner in the House of Lords. The UK became capable to the control of the European Union in 1972.

Hierarchy of Civil Court Hierarchy of Criminal Court


European Court of Justice


Supreme Court


Court of Appeal

( Civil Division )


High Court


County Court

European Court of Justice


Supreme Court


Court of Appeal

( condemnable Division )


Queen ‘s Bench Division


Crown Court


Magistrates ‘ Court

European tribunal of human rights

12The European tribunal of human rights ( ECtHR ) is an international judicial organic structure established under the European Convention on human rights of 1950 to supervise regard of human rights by provinces. It was established in1959 and to the full came into pattern in the United Kingdom in 1966.[ 13 ]It is made up of 47 Judgess, one for each member province and sits full-time in Strasbourg-France. It determinations binds all lower tribunals in its member provinces.[ 14 ]There were an increasing figure of instances being taken to the European tribunal of human rights in 2008 which caused a backlog of instances, with over 90,000 instances to with, in 2009.


The Court accepts applications of cases of human rights misdemeanors from persons every bit good as provinces. However, it is rare for a province to subject allegations against another province, unless the misdemeanor is terrible. In order for an application to be accepted by the Court, all domestic legal redresss available to the applier must hold been exhausted. Example of single instances to the tribunal the instance the instance of S and Marper V UK ( 2008 ) sing indefinite retained of Deoxyribonucleic acid on the database of constabulary without being found guilty of an offense. Additionally:

Role of Solicitor

15Solicitors trade with most of the paper works and act as am go-betweens between clients and Barristers. Accountant and other professionals may reach Barrister ( advocators ) straight Most of the legal work done outside the tribunal is performed by canvassers. A canvasser may pull contracts, volitions and conveyance. A canvasser owes responsibility of confidentiality to his client. A client has the right to action his or her canvasser for amendss if he feels the canvasser is negligent.[ 16 ]If the behavior of a canvasser is contrary to the jurisprudence, he may be apt for condemnable proceedings. A canvasser is non above the jurisprudence. They can me penalize when found guilty or offense or can be suspended for misconduct.

The tribunal members of the Supreme Court have the legal power to suspend him for misconduct. Like a barrister, a canvasser can be apt for disdain of tribunal.

Functions of Barristers

17Barristers ( advocators ) accept direction for clients upon referral from canvassers. All Barristers have responsibility to their clients.[ 18 ]They must, by any legitimate agencies, devote themselves wholly to their clients ‘ legal demands in a place of trust and assurance. A barrister must non misdirect the tribunal or an opposition and must introduce the tribunal with the true province of the jurisprudence whether or non it favours the client ‘s instance. Their responsibilities to the jurisprudence and tribunal require them to keep a high criterion of legal acquisition with a committedness non to help or take part in a breach of the jurisprudence because of their traditional maps as particular advocators.[ 19 ]Barristers practising at the Bar are freelance. They can portion administrative disbursals by working from set of Chamberss with other barristers.

Functions of Judges

20Judges interpret the jurisprudence. They are independent from the constabulary and the authorities. If person is unhappy with a justice ‘s determination, they must appeal to a higher tribunal. It is the occupation of a justice, that wrongdoers are punished.[ 21 ]Judges besides apply ‘common jurisprudence ‘ , which is the jurisprudence that has grown out of determinations by Judgess in tribunal instances over decennaries and even centuries.

Decisions made by Judgess in higher tribunals are recorded, and Judgess on lower tribunals must follow them.


JuriesA are a pledged organic structure of people convened to render impartial finding of fact.[ 22 ]Juries were used in the English Legal System before the Norman Conquest. Originally they acted as informants instead than determinations shapers. Modern juries tend to be found in tribunals to make up one’s mind whether an accused individual is guilty or non guilty of a offense in condemnable instances. They are used in civil instances in limited fortunes to distinct instances of calumny, malicious prosecution and fraud. They are used in the tribunals below Crown tribunal for condemnable tests, High tribunal, Queen ‘s Bench Division, County tribunal and Coroner ‘s tribunals.


There are two types of magistrates. Lay magistrates and stipendiary magistrates.[ 23 ]Lay magistrate have long history in the English legal system, dating back to the justness of Peace Act 1361 which likely in response to a offense moving ridge, gave judicial powers to name laic people.[ 24 ]They are entitled to claim travel and subsistence disbursals. They are normally people with no old experience and[ 25 ]they are appointed by the Lord Chancellor on the recommendation of the Lord Lieutenant of a county or the council of a borough. They undergo a class of developing on assignment but the chief intent of this is non so much to learn them jurisprudence as to develop them move in judicial mode. Lay magistrates work on a portion clip bases.

Stipendiary magistrate is a paid full-time qualified attorney, appointed by the Crown on the recommendation of the Lord Chancellor. Stipendiary magistrates in London are known as Metropolitan Stipendiary magistrates. Both types of magistrates must retire at the age of 70 and both may be removed from office by the Lord Chancellor for incompetency.


I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out