The ethics in Journalism

March 29, 2019 Human Rights

The ethics in Journalism is difficult profession and a very important field that everyone must really consider with the way they practice their ethics and activities. Any journalist who is reporting some type of news must be relevant to the society. The main goal of journalism is to provide some type of awareness to the public regarding the latest updates and trending news that our society needs to know. The way social media is, it is a more quicker way for displaying and reporting information to the society because nowadays everyone is always on their phone 24/7 so it makes it easier for people to find out what is going on. The public is the main purpose because they need to be inform regarding and story that may risk the lives of the community, but also have social media spread faster news than local news on the television. The reason behind this is to stop or help prevent any risks that are causing a stress to our society.
Ethics in journalism comes with a responsibility because the public relays on the information that is given. One of the main reasons is that some of the Government units can conflict the interest with the public. Every news report that is detailed and exclusive comes with the principle of rawness because the public needs to know the truth of the information being published online. Of course, any type of article, news reporting information has a big responsibility while posting the story. The reason is to ensure that the news becomes reliable to the public. According to their interest in information that relates to the public provides a reason for the society to put their trust with the journalist who is responsible for reporting certain news that is being published. If the journalist continues to provide a very professional way of publishing recent and relevant news, they start to gain more respect from their fellow colleague as well as by the public. For example, “Medis is not being objective and is not the way it used to be, when they respected people. Respecting people’s rights and privacy to their own private lives. Every journalist changes the story a little bit”. (Howard)
Rebecca Skloot in fact did go out to follow Henrietta Lack’s story and she went in to get the facts. Despite that she is a white female journalist, she did and took the risk and her professionalism in going after this story was very respectful but at the same time rude because she kept insisting. Day was already not having it but maybe Skloot insisted because she wanted the people to know the real facts about Henrietta’s Cells. “The new media landscape has brought to public debate a set of new concerns and challenges, regarding the problems of ethics in communication. It is rather clear that ethical issues associated to communication have always provoked strong public controversies” (Fidalgo).
Journalist must respect people’s human rights. “The news media, industry and it’s individual practioniors (i.e., journalists and television news anchors) are assailed constantly with complaints regarding distortion, bias, and lack of objectivity.” (Myrick). For example, “Gey was contacted by other media types who wanted Henrietta’s full story.” (ILHL). “The role of ethics in defining what it means to be a professional journalist; challenges to professional journalism’s autonomy from “amateurs” and how ethics is used to maintain boundaries between them; and objectivity as a tenet of professional journalism ethics”. (Craft). Respect the privacy of those dealing with tragedy and avoid providing potentially harmful information. Example, if you’ve realized you’ve made mistakes accurately presenting to the truth, accept responsibility and supply the corrections to the public via your media source. Also, in the book ILHL, Skloot tells us that is possible that Gey let the identity mistake stand to throw reporters off the trail leading to the real Henrietta Lack’s.
I think one of the most vital and best ethical responsibilities of commentary is to account a certain topic or a specific story, that way it does not violate in any way the rights of other people. The purpose is to prevent any misunderstandings or have the people’s minds go crazy as they are watching or listening to the news on social media or television to become very aware of any truthful information that affects the public’s personal issues or beliefs. Examples are racism, talking bad about a certain topic, or arguments. Some News reporters do have to go over their articles or news before publishing it on the public eye to avoid any risks of getting involved in certain lawsuits but then there are those who just like to public just to get viewers and engage them into their nonsense stories. Imagine just watching the news and all it would be was bad news? People would go insane. “Bad news can in fact persuade people that the world is much more dangerous than it is”. (Rivers).
Journalism Ethics in new media usually observes that a lot of fake news reports are now increasing over the internet. Examples are news about a popular celebrity or a politician that passed away recently. However, the reality of the article or story published online fails to confirm it because the person who published the article is not an official journalist. That is because the people’s voices are being perceived on the internet more that anyone can post any incident and makes it go viral, yet those people sometimes don’t get credit for what they have published. Sometimes journalist is at risk for taking other people’s stories/news reporting because since the information that has been reported has comparable content with the reporter’s news report. “According to Herman and Chomsky’s “propaganda model”, the information conveyed by the news media is largely determined, both with regard to the agenda-setting and the framing of the news, by the “persuasion industries”. Unlike those media, the Internet offers, at least for now, the possibility that different, alternative voices of citizens and civic and non-governmental organizations are freely heard.” (Serra). Millennials do have interest in the news. They don’t watch T.V but they are always on their cellphones. The platform is the internet. This is one of my main points because nowadays this is all we see and which they prefer because it is easier to understand.”You’re all probably familiar with Buzzfeed. If you’re not, you really need to get familiar with it. It’s hiring, alongside Jim, some of the finest young journalist in Britain today and you really should prepare yourself for a media Guardian headline along the lines of, it’s going to be a Buzzfeed Election.” (Changing Face of News). This is an important fact that the world is revolving more towards the social media news. For example, now they have on snapchat on the explore page buzzfeed news and people’s magazine and other types of sources, it makes it easier for us because we don’t have to buy the magazine or wait till the news comes on at a certain time to know what is going on in this crazy world.There is also on facebook, people can go live and start sharing news, which is cool because you just never know. Let’s say an earthquake occurred and yes there will be something on the news about it, but once you go on facebook live you can see more of what reporters can not show you on the television. When people share videos like that then it goes viral. This I also a way of how I mentioned before that a lot of the public can get their voice heard and out there because most people do like to send out a message and people can relate to whatever issues they are going through and maybe they can help someone. I like to think that the public to prefer social media news over the old fashioned way, like actually doing work and just writing people information down and then waiting to publish it.
In conclusion, there are many types of ethics in Journalism and different types of Journalist. Some come with facts and others lie to get more viewers. The most convenient way to be engaged with the news or the way reporters write their stories is by going online because everything is literally on there. The way Skloot presented her ethics in writing this book was the best she could ever have done. I also think that her way of reporting the story of Henrietta Lack’s was in a way was how reporters did it back in the days and if she would have maybe done a video of the interviews and post it online, more people would’ve found this story very interesting. Yes, media news can be risky because some like to report fake news all the time, but that is only to have more viewers, although social media news can have it’s downsid


I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out