The Fault In Our Stars Analysis Essay

October 9, 2017 Medical

Hazel Grace Lancaster. a 16-year-old adolescent with thyroid malignant neoplastic disease that has spread to her lungs. attends a malignant neoplastic disease patients’ support group at her mother’s behest. During a support meeting. Hazel meets a 17-year-old teenage male child named Augustus Waters. whose osteogenic sarcoma caused him to lose his leg. Augustus is at the meeting to back up his common friend. Isaac. who is losing his staying oculus to malignant neoplastic disease. The two bond instantly after the meeting and Augustus invites Hazel to his house where the two strengthen their bond over a film and their experiences with malignant neoplastic disease. Before going. the two agree to read each other’s favourite novels. Augustus gives Hazel The Price of Dawn. and Hazel recommends An Imperial Affliction. a novel. written by Peter Van Houten. about a cancer-stricken miss named Anna that parallels Hazel’s ain experience. After Augustus coatings reading her book. he is frustrated upon larning that the fresh terminals suddenly without a decision. Hazel explains the novel’s cryptic writer had retreated following the novel’s publication and has non been heard from since. A hebdomad subsequently. Augustus reveals to Hazel that he has tracked down Van Houten’s helper. Lidewij. and. through her. has managed to get down an e-mail correspondence with Van Houten.

Hazel writes to Van Houten with inquiries sing the novel’s equivocal stoping and the destiny of the female parent of Anna. Van Houten finally replies. explicating that he can merely reply Hazel’s inquiries in individual. Hazel proposes the trip to her female parent but is rejected due to fiscal and medical restraints. Subsequently. at a Dutch-themed field day. Augustus surprises Hazel with tickets to Amsterdam. attained through a charitable foundation. She is thrilled. but when he touches her face she feels hesitant for some ground. Subsequently. she looks up Augustus’s ex-girlfriend. Caroline Mathers. who died of encephalon malignant neoplastic disease. On Caroline’s memorial page. a remark by Caroline’s friend causes Hazel to compare herself to a grenade: Hazel loves Augustus and frights aching him when she dies. As she struggles with her love for Augustus and her decease. Hazel suffers an episode of pleural gush and is sent to the Intensive Care Unit ( ICU ) motivating her parents and her physicians to oppugn the safety of abroad travel. The medical squad argues against the trip until Dr. Maria. one of the doctors most familiar with her instance. convinces Hazel’s parents that Hazel must go because she needs to populate her life. When Hazel and Gus foremost acquire to Amsterdam. they go to a eating house and happen that Van Houten paid for their repast and bubbly. Augustus so confesses his love for Hazel that dark.

Hazel and Augustus eventually meet Van Houten but are shocked to happen that. alternatively of a fecund mastermind. he is a mean-spirited rummy. Horrified by Van Houten’s behaviour. Lidewij confesses to holding arranged the meeting on his behalf. angering Van Houten. who proceeds to diss Hazel’s malignant neoplastic disease and refuses to reply any of her inquiries. The two leave the writer in choler and letdown. Accompanied by Lidewij. Hazel and Augustus visit the Anne Frank House. Hazel struggles to mount the many stepss and ladders taking up to the Attic due to her lungs but by the terminal of the circuit. Augustus and Hazel portion a romantic buss. followed by an hand clapping from the other tourers in the Attic. The following twenty-four hours. Augustus confesses that a recent PET scan revealed his malignant neoplastic disease to hold relapsed. Resolute. the two affirm their love and support for each other. Upon their return to Indianapolis. Augustus’ wellness significantly worsens. Augustus ends up in the ICU for a few yearss.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

In his concluding yearss. Augustus invites Isaac and Hazel to his pre-funeral. where they give eulogiums. Hazel quotes Van Houten about “larger and smaller eternities. ” reaffirms her love for him. and states that she would non merchandise their short clip together for anything in the universe. Augustus dies eight yearss subsequently. At the funeral. Hazel is astonished to happen Van Houten in attending. He explains that he and Augustus maintained correspondence since Amsterdam and that Augustus had demanded he do up for destroying their trip by go toing his funeral. In an effort for forgiveness. Van Houten tries to uncover the destiny of Anna’s female parent. Hazel. still upset with his behaviour. asks him to go forth. A few yearss subsequently. while speaking with Isaac. Hazel learns that Augustus may hold been composing a subsequence to An Imperial Affliction for her. As Hazel hunts for the pages. she once more brushs Van Houten.

He confides in Hazel that his novel was a literary effort to accommodate with the decease of his girl. Anna. who died from malignant neoplastic disease when she was eight. Hazel tells Van Houten to sober up and compose another book. Finally Hazel learns that Augustus sent the pages to Van Houten because he wanted Van Houten to utilize the pages to compose a well-written eulogium about Hazel. Lidewij forces Van Houten to read the pages and sends them to Hazel. Hazel reads Augustus’s words. He says acquiring hurt in this universe is inevitable. but we do acquire to take who we allow to ache us. and that he is happy with his pick. He hopes she likes her pick excessively. Hazel states she does.

Critics

The Mistake in Our Stars has received critical acclamation from critics. Critics largely praised the book for its wit. strong characters. linguistic communication. subjects and new position on malignant neoplastic disease and love affair. The New York Times ’? reappraisal of the book called it “a blend of melancholy. Sweet. philosophical and funny” and said that it “stays the class of tragic realism” . while observing that the book’s unpleasant secret plan inside informations “do nil to decrease the love affair ; in Green’s custodies. they merely make it more moving. ” [ 16 ] NPR’s Rachel Syme noted that “ [ Green’s ] voice is so obsessively clear that it defies classification. ” stating that the “elegantly plotted” book “may be his best. ” [ 17 ] Time called The Mistake in Our Stars “damn near mastermind. ” [ 18 ] Entertainment Weekly wrote. “ [ Augustus and Hazel’s ] love narrative is every bit existent as it is doomed. and the gut-busting laughs that come early in the fresh make the aglow concluding pages all the more heartbreaking” . and gave the novel an overall A? class. [ 19 ] Amazon. com calls it “insightful. bold. irreverent. and raw” and Green’s “most ambitious and heartbreaking work yet. ” [ 20 ] The Manila Bulletin says that the book is “a aggregation of maudlin scenes and banal observations about the breakability of life and the wisdom of deceasing.

And while it does speak about those things and more. the intervention of it is far from being maudlin or trite. ” [ 21 ] The Manila Bulletin besides added that “Just two paragraphs into the work. and he instantly wallops the readers with such an insightful observation delivered in such an tough-minded manner that its difficult non to agitate your caput in esteem. ” [ 21 ] The Manila Bulletin stated that The Fault in Our Stars was a victory for John Green. [ 21 ] USA Today called it a “elegiac comedy. ” [ 22 ] They gave the book a evaluation of four out of four stars. [ 22 ] The School Library Journal stated that it was “a strong pick for Adult Collections. ” [ 23 ] The Mistake in Our Stars received a asterisked reappraisal from Kirkus Reviews. who described it as “a cleverly crafted rational detonation of a love affair. ” [ 24 ] Several well-known writers have contributed their ain positive reappraisals for the book. Jodi Picoult. writer of My Sister’s Keeper. calls The Mistake in Our Stars “an electric portrayal of immature people who learn to populate life with one pes in the grave. ” She goes on to state that the novel is “filled with disconnected explosions of wit and calamity. ”

Bestselling writer of The Book Thief. Markus Zusak. depict it as “a novel of life and decease and the people caught in between” and “John Green at his best” . Refering to Green’s composing throughout the book. E. Lockhart. writer of The Boyfriend List. says “He makes me laugh and pant at the beauty of a sentence or the turn of a narrative. He is one of the best authors alive and I am huming with enviousness of his endowment. ” [ 20 ] Time named The Mistake in Our Stars as the # 1 fiction book of 2012. [ 25 ] Kirkus Reviews listed it among the top 100 children’s books of 2012. [ 26 ] It besides made USA Today ’?s list of the top 10 books of 2012. [ 27 ] In 2013. the Edmonton Journal named the book one of their “favourite books of the twelvemonth. ” [ 28 ] One noteworthy unfavourable sentiment appeared in the Daily Mail. [ 29 ]

In the piece. the secret plan of The Fault in Our Stars was described as ?mawkish at best. exploitative at worst? and the book was characterized as belonging to the ?sick-lit? immature grownup genre. together with other young-adult novels such as Never Eighteen and Before I Die. This full genre. every bit good as the genre of young-adult novels covering with suicide and self-harm ( the piece references Thirteen Reasons Why ; By the Time You Read This. I’ll Be Dead ; The Lovely Bones ; and Red Tears ) was criticized as being ?distasteful? and inappropriate for their mark audience of teens. [ 30 ] The Guardian criticized the piece. indicating out in peculiar that The Fault in Our Stars was chosen by The Guardian as that month’s ?teen book nine choice? because ?it’s a gripping read. having two compelling characters. that deals sensitively and even humorously with a hard state of affairs without falling into bathos. ? In general. The Guardian faulted The Daily Mail for proposing that the issues of unwellness. depression. and gender are inappropriate exactly ?in the 1 topographic point where hard topics have traditionally been most sensitively explored for teens: fiction written specifically for them. ? [ 30 ] For his portion. in an interview for The Guardian. John Green said. ?The thing that bothered me about The Daily Mail piece was that it was a spot condescending to adolescents. I’m tired of grownups stating adolescents that they aren’t smart. that they can’t read critically. that they aren’t thoughtful. and I feel like that article made those statements. ?

Fictional characters

Hazel Grace Lancaster – The novel’s storyteller and 16-year-old supporter. An astute and unusually painstaking miss. Hazel was diagnosed at age 13 with a terminal signifier of thyroid malignant neoplastic disease that has since spread to her lungs. She keeps most people at a distance. cognizing her decease will finally ache them. until she falls in love with Augustus. Augustus “Gus” Waters – The sixteen-year-old with osteogenic sarcoma who becomes Hazel’s fellow. Augustus has a acute humor and a inclination toward performance—he revels in expansive romantic gestures. Augustus about instantly falls in love with Hazel after run intoing her at Support Group Isaac – The common friend of Hazel’s and Augustus’s who facilitates their debut at Support Group. Isaac is misanthropic by nature. Blinded by malignant neoplastic disease and kicked to the kerb by his girlfriend Monica. Isaac frequently embodies incredulity and fury. It is deserving observing that he portions his name with Biblical Isaac. who besides was blind. Mrs. Lancaster – Hazel’s female parent. She is an emotionally strong and sort adult female who has made it her life to care for Hazel. During the fresh Hazel obsesses over the emotional desolation that her decease will do to her female parent. In the terminal Hazel is overjoyed to larn that her female parent has in secret been taking categories to go a societal worker.

Mr. Lancaster – Hazel’s male parent. He is caring and prone to cryings. In contrast with Hazel’s female parent. he merely understands Hazel’s malignant neoplastic disease loosely and spends much of his clip at work. Peter Van Houten – The ill-famed writer of An Imperial Affliction. Hazel and Augustus learn he is a long-winded and cheeky rummy who pretentiously deflects emotion with walls of intellectualism and inhuman treatment Patrick – The leader and exclusive grownup at Support Group. He is noted for his heat and univocal optimism. As a effect of malignant neoplastic disease Patrick lost both of his testiss. which provides some of the more misanthropic group members with a spot of amusing alleviation Augustus’s parents – The few glances that we get of Augustus’s parents in the novel are of sort and understanding people.

They do non waver to vegetarianize Hazel’s repast. Near the terminal of the novel. it means a batch to Hazel when Augustus’s male parent susurrations in her ear about how great it is that she has been involved in his son’s life Dr. Maria – Hazel’s primary malignant neoplastic disease physician. She is a strong. assertive. yet empathic doctor. At one point Hazel comments that Dr. Maria is really into giving out clinchs. She convinces Hazel’s parents that Hazel should be allowed to go to Amsterdam. despite their reserves. Kaitlyn – Hazel’s friend and former classmate. She is reasonably. popular. and exemplifies what Hazel might hold been like if she hadn’t been diagnosed with malignant neoplastic disease and left school. Though they are still friends. there is a tangible distance between the two misss. who occupy such divergent universes.

MORAL VALUE

We shouldn’t view decease as a awful thing ; when decease is being forced upon us before it should. we have two picks. Wait for it to go on. or experience life as it happens and do the best of what you’ve got.

Sometimes it’s non about the finish. it’s the experience.

Accepting that life isn’t just

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out