The Mendelssohn Concerto in E Minor Essay

By July 18, 2017 Construction

“I would wish to compose a fiddle concerto for following winter. One in E minor supports running through my caput. and the gap gives me no peace. ” German composer Felix Mendelssohn wrote to his friend. violinist Ferdinand David. in 1838. Mendelssohn would seek to join forces on his last orchestral work with David. revising it fastidiously until its premiere in Leipzig in 1845. The first motion of Mendelssohn’s Violin Concerto in E Minor. Op. 4. is considered a basic of the fiddle repertory and an illustration piece of the romantic period. While Mendelssohn is widely recognized as a romantic who remained loyal chiefly to traditional. classical signifiers. the proficient demands of the soloist. the fresh arrangement and qualities of the cadenza. and the characteristics of the overall signifier illustrate both the freshness of the concerto and why it served as an illustration for later composers. The concerto is credited with being disputing but manageable in its proficient demands of the soloist.

While it contains many intricate techniques. it “plays good under the fingers. ” doubtless because of Ferdinand David’s input. Because of this. it is widely used by violin teachers to present concerti to pupils. Its topographic point as an introductory larning tool is held by Mendelssohn’s frequent usage of octaves ( dry run B and K ) to take the participant to arrival points such as the high “B” after dry run B. seen in Example 1.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Example 1: Varied usage of octaves environing dry run B. The Classical manner to which Mendelssohn remained loyal is characterized in technique by his usage of carom obeisance. first developed by Niccolo Paganini. in the chord subdivision instantly following the cadenza after rehearsal missive O. While many of his schemes were common in the concerto’s clip ( including speech pattern and tenuto articulations and virtuosic melodious lines ) . Mendelssohn departs from tradition in his intervention of the carom obeisance technique.

It is used to attach to an orchestra that reintroduces the subject after the cadenza ; this is a reversal of the traditional function of holding the soloist recapitulate the chief thought. The Mendelssohn concerto is besides fresh in its intervention of the cadenza. The series of arpeggios in the carom bowing manner before dry run P ( or figure 13 ) can be considered an extension of the traditional Classical cadenza played merely by the soloist because these are continued after the orchestra re-enters ( see Example 2 ) .

Example 2: The orchestra re-enters at dry run 13 as the soloist accompanies. Example 2: The orchestra re-enters at dry run 13 as the soloist accompanies. In the classical signifier. such as that used by Mozart in the first motion of his Violin Concerto in A major. KV 219. the cadenza is considered an wholly separate subdivision from the orchestra. Besides novel for the concerto’s clip is Mendelssohn’s arrangement of the cadenza between the development and palingenesis subdivisions. as opposed to its usual topographic point at the terminal of the motion.

Placement at the terminal can be found in Mozart’s concerto. every bit good as in the first motion of the Paganini Violin Concerto No. 1 ( closed by merely a short orchestra subdivision ) . Another difference from the composings of Mendelssohn’s predecessors and coevalss is the fact that. in his careful redaction. Mendelssohn wrote out the full cadenza for the soloist ; many classical composers intended for improvisation to be involved. either in maintaining with their thoughts or as wholly new thoughts.

This tradition can be seen in the first motion of Beethoven’s Violin Concerto in D Major. Op. 1 ; a cadenza subsequently written by Fritz Kreisler is one of the most normally performed for Beethoven’s first motion. Other formal characteristics promote the concerto’s place as novel for its clip. As a contrast to the traditional “double exposition” classical theoretical account. the fiddle enters at the start with a surging tune after merely two steps of orchestral debut. The classical theoretical account usually contains a full expounding. with the orchestra presenting the chief subjects before the soloist enters.

In consequence. the orchestra and the soloist perform two separate expoundings. Although the three motions of the concerto are written in the standard fast-slow-fast construction. typical from tradition was Mendelssohn’s determination to make a through-composed signifier. in which the three motions are connected. or played attacca. At the terminal of the first motion and into the 2nd. the bassoon’s held note serves as a nexus between the two. a simple passage to a lyrical 2nd motion.

The proficient and formal characteristics of the fiddle concerto. as compared to Mendelssohn’s instruction in the classical signifier. illustrate that the work was advanced for its clip. Mendelssohn’s coaction with Ferdinand David demonstrates the work’s attending to proficient item. Mendelssohn’s careful redaction is illustrated by the complete composing of the cadenza. as opposed to one intended for improvisation. The first movement’s freshness in technique and signifier besides serves as an illustration as to why Mendelssohn was as inspiration to later composers such as Joseph Joachim and William Sterndale Bennett.


I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out