The Nature of Humanity in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Essay

October 9, 2017 Chemistry

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein examines the really nature of humanity through the apposition of two characters. Victor Frankenstein and the animal. The funny animal has an guiltless desire to larn whereas Victor Frankenstein pursues his blasphemed aspiration. The animal has a sincere desire to belong in the human universe but he is incapable of properly showing himself whereas Victor Frankenstein isolates himself from humanity to conceal his guilt. The sympathetic animal is an innately good being who was turned evil by a rejecting society whereas Victor Frankenstein is full of hatred and retaliation.

The creature’s actions and qualities weighed against those of his Godhead in a moral criterion combine to do him more qualitively human than Victor. Victor Frankenstein’s chase of cognition is hurtful to himself and everyone around him whereas the animal has a echt desire to go more human. Frankenstein fails to continue his morality by trying to achieve god-like power. His wonder for the secrets of life is iniquitous. like Adam and Eve who ate the fruit from the tree of the cognition of good and evil.

Frankenstein “seems to hold lost all psyche or esthesis but for [ his ] one chase. ”1 1 Mary Shelley. Frankenstein ( New York: A Division of Random House Inc. . 2003 ) 40. From the beginning of his work. Frankenstein is going dehumanized. His head being wholly occupied with the animal and its homicidal enterprises. Frankenstein moves further and farther off from humanity. Victor Frankenstein’s involvements in chemistry and ancient scientific discipline are worthless in his modern universe.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

However. Victor ignores Mr. Krempe’s suggestion of analyzing natural doctrine and furthers his involvements in detecting the secrets of life. Victor Frankenstein has the possible to go a helpful being to the universe but his misguided pick leads him to go a destroyer of several lives. Unlike Victor Frankenstein. the creature’s desire for cognition brings him closer to humanity. The animal applies his whole head to larning the linguistic communication of the cottage dwellers as he prepares to uncover himself to them. The animal wants to be accepted as a humanly person.

His wonder for the linguistic communication of the cottage dwellers is guiltless. like Adam and Eve before they ate from the tree of the cognition of good and evil. The animal. without shame or guilt. becomes closer and closer to humanity. The creature’s guiltless desire to larn weighed against Victor Frankenstein’s iniquitous rational chases make him a more painstaking homo being than his Godhead. Their rational chases lead to their isolation from humanity as Frankenstein secludes himself from his household and friends and the animal fails to be accepted by worlds.

Victor Frankenstein continues his secretiveness out of shame and guilt. whereas the monster is forced into privacy by his revolting visual aspect. Victor Frankenstein is a selfish character who isolates himself from humanity because of his indefinable offenses. Although Victor is cognizant of the decease of William and his liquidator. Victor does non proclaim the creative activity of his animal. even to his closest relations. for fright of being accused of being insane. Victor becomes the true liquidator as his failure to take duty for his actions causes the deceases of two members of his household.

He attempts to get away his guilt by making a cloak of secretiveness which secludes him from his household and friends. His relationship to humanity is damaged. doing him less human. Victor Frankenstein loses the ability to react to his demands and wants. After the slaying of his married woman. Elizabeth. Victor Frankenstein indulges in destructing the monster. even following him to the cold Arctic. He “determines still to swear [ himself ] to the clemency of the seas instead than abandoning [ his ] intent. ”2 Victor Frankenstein has a stronger desire to destruct the monster than to last.

His humanity has reached its greatest ruin as Elizabeth. his lover. is destroyed and he is incapable of experiencing felicity and joy. Unlike Victor Frankenstein. the animal has a sincere desire to belong but is isolated by humanity because of his grotesque visual aspect. Being innately good. the animal is cognizant that people are afraid of him and fells himself from the universe. The animal shows his sort spirit by roll uping wood for the cottage dwellers at dark and salvaging a adult female from submerging. However. he is viciously rejected by them and is forced to go alone and vindictive.

The creature’s effort at incorporating himself into humanity makes him internally human. The animal shows a stronger desire to be accepted into humanity than his Godhead. doing him a more amorous human than Victor. The creature’s forsaking and the decease of Victor’s household and friends cause the two characters to be vindictive against each other. Victor Frankenstein acts upon the consequences of his ain errors whereas the animal is forced to move upon the fortunes that are given to him by his Godhead.

The creature’s actions mirror those of his Godhead. like a boy and a male parent. The animal. rejected by society and his Godhead. becomes a vindictive character. 2 Mary Shelley. Frankenstein ( New York: A Division of Random House Inc. . 2003 ) 199. After the animal was miserably abandoned by Victor Frankenstein and stolen of his lone future comrade. he vows to return the piquing actions to his Godhead. The animal revengefully destroys Victor Frankenstein’s friends and household. go forthing his Godhead every bit lonely as himself.

The creature’s reaction of fury is expected from an baby without attention. “A atrocious selfishness hurried me on. while my bosom was poisoned with compunction. ”3 The animal. like an baby. imitates the actions of Victor Frankenstein. his male parent. The innately good animal fthms that murdering is incorrect but he is misguided by Victor’s immoral actions. After the decease of Frankenstein. the animal deeply sympathizes his Godhead. “I pitied Frankenstein ; my commiseration amounted to horror ; I abhorred myself. ”4 His guilt in doing the decease of his Godhead leads to his self-destruction.

The creature’s retribution is a mere representation of his choler and contradicts his sincere love for Frankenstein. Unlike the animal. Victor Frankenstein fails to acknowledge his errors and blames his wretchedness on the animal. Victor Frankenstein wholly abandons his creative activity because of its revolting visual aspect and refuses to take duty for the animal by denying him a suited comrade. His selfishness blinds him from his errors towards the animal. and deprives him of empathy and compunction.

Alternatively. Frankenstein tries to apologize his immoral behaviours by destructing the animal. His inhumane actions against the animal create an ageless conflict between the two characters. “Swear to me. Walton. that he shall non get away. that you will seek him and fulfill my retribution in his decease. ”5 3 Mary Shelley. Frankenstein ( New York: A Division of Random House Inc. . 2003 ) 209. 4 Mary Shelley. Frankenstein ( New York: A Division of Random House Inc. . 2003 ) 210. 5 Mary Shelley. Frankenstein ( New York: A Division of Random House Inc. . 2003 ) 199.

Frankenstein’s sole intent in life is to destruct the animal. He has no understanding towards the animal. merely a strong desire to take retaliation. Victor Frankenstein’s retribution towards the animal is a representation of his hatred towards the animal. The creature’s sincere love for his Godhead compared to Victor Frankenstein’s irrevokable hatred towards his creative activity makes the animal a more ethical homo than his Godhead. The animal is more qualitively human than Victor Frankenstein as his actions and qualities are progressively moral than those of Victor’s.

The creature’s naif wonder to larn to pass on with the cottage dwellers qualifies him as a more painstaking human than Victor. who has a iniquitous aspiration to detect the secret of life. The animal is a more amorous human than Victor Frankenstein. as his yearning to be accepted surpasses those of Victor’s. The animal is a more ethical homo than Victor Frankenstein. as he shows sorrow and understanding to his Godhead for his destructive actions although the animal was abandoned by him. Therefore. in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. the animal is a more painstaking. amatory. and ethical homo than Victor.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out