The Role of the Government on Tobacco Use Essay

October 2, 2017 Health

The article. “If It’s Good For Philip Morris. Can It Besides Be Good for Public Health? . ” which was written by concern editorialist Joe Nocera and published in the New York Times. fundamentally explores the worlds refering the authorities. peculiarly the Food and Drug Administration. and the ordinance of baccy usage.

Harmonizing to the article. although baccy company executives themselves. notably Steve Parrish. senior vice-president of Philip Morris have openly supported the ordinance of baccy usage. it appears that the move lacks a conjunct attempt from the authorities. Furthermore. it is besides evident that baccy executives like Parrish have their personal concern dockets in recommending baccy ordinance.

In general. it is safe to presume that the populace is more than cognizant about the dangers and wellness hazards associated with baccy smoke such as lung malignant neoplastic disease. emphysema. and assorted bosom diseases. among others. However. it is interesting to observe that despite the assorted runs against baccy smoke and other educational advertizements about it. there are still 1000000s of people around the universe who smoke. In fact. based on the article. in 2005. Philip Morris USA entirely hauled in $ 4. 6 billion in net incomes.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

In this respect. it is rather obvious that the government’s chief function is to somehow modulate baccy usage so that tobacco users will non endure its deathly effects. However. this is easier said that done. Harmonizing to the article. while there have been several enterprises to modulate baccy usage in the past. such as the prohibition on all coffin nail advertizements. it seems to fall short when it comes to the existent execution.

The first plausible ground behind this is that the ordinance would intend lessening in net incomes for baccy companies. which in bend. would impact baccy mill workers. And sing the planetary fiscal crisis. loss of occupations is non a logical option even though it’s for the benefit of the public’s wellness.

In short. while the government’s responsibility in baccy usage is clear. it is virtually powerless to do any strong moves that would carry through their function. The baccy executives. on the other manus. may demo that they support tobacco ordinance. but their true motivations are ill-defined. After all. they are still business communities and it would non be surprising if their actions are merely meant to gain extra net incomes.

Mentions

Nocera. J. ( 2006 ) . If It’s Good For Philip Morris. Can It Besides Be Good for Public Health? The New York Times. Retrieved April 17. 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nytimes. com/2006/06/18/magazine/18tobacco. hypertext markup language? pagewanted=3 & A ; _r=1.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out