The Third Research Objective sought to determine

April 19, 2019 Human Resources

The Third Research Objective sought to determine the effect of Evaluation Costs on project performance in Rwanda. The identified model equation to understand this relationship was:
PTimeliness = 1.445 +0.888X3 for Performance(Timeliness)
PNumber of Activities = 1.291 +0.684X3 for Performance(Number of Activities)
The study findings showed that Evaluation Costs had a statistically significant effect on project performance in Rwanda with Evaluation Costs correlation coefficient of ?=.888 for project performance in terms of Timeliness and ?=.684 for project performance in terms of Number of Activities.
5.3 Discussion of the Findings
The First Research Objective sought to determine the effect of Monitoring & Evaluation Training on project performance in Rwanda. The study findings showed that Monitoring & Evaluation Training had a statistically significant effect on the project performance in Rwanda with Monitoring & Evaluation Training correlation coefficient of ?=.594 for project performance in terms of Timeliness and ?=.871 for project performance in terms of Number of Activities . The strong positive correlations compare well with the findings of Vanessa and Gala (2011) who established that technical capacity and expertise of project staff in conducting evaluations, the value and participation of its human resources during the decision making process as well as their motivation in implementing the decision can hugely impact on project performance. This position is further supported by Shapiro, (2004) as well as Vanessa and Gala, (2011).
The Second Research Objective sought to determine the effect of Evaluation Time Frame on project performance in Rwanda. The study findings indicated that Evaluation Time Frame had a statistically significant effect on project performance in Rwanda with a Evaluation Time Frame correlation coefficient of ?=.829 for project performance in terms of Timeliness and ?=.629 for project performance in terms of Number of Activities. The statistically significant positive correlations also compare well with the findings of Peterson & Fisher (2009) who established that construction firms are usually interested in monitoring project time variance and verifying contractor progress payments requests. This position is further supported byKariungi, (2014) and Bredillet, (2009).
The Third Research Objective sought to determine the effect of Evaluation Costs on project performance in Rwanda. The study findings showed that Evaluation Costs had a statistically significant effect on project performance in Rwanda with Evaluation Costs correlation coefficient of ?=.888 for project performance in terms of Timeliness and ?=.684 for project performance in terms of Number of Activities. The strong statistically significant positive correlations also compare well with the findings of Sorah, (2003) and Patton, (2008).

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out