To what Extent did Slavery Play a Role as the Cause of the Civil War

October 19, 2017 Teaching

To what widen did slavery play a function as the cause of the Civil War?

Section A: Plan of Probe

This probe will measure the inquiry, to what extent did slavery play a function as the cause of the Civil War? Due to their ideological differences about bondage, the North and South, started to split in the 1820’s through 1865. The contention between the two, approximately bondage, caused tensenesss to up rise in the US in the 1800’s which led to the American Civil War. The range of this probe focuses on how the events prior to slavery which led to the approaching Civil War. One method to be used during this probe will be to analyze the assorted paperss that allowed bondage to go on up to the Civil War. Another method will be to mention beginnings that analyze the upcoming of the war that indicate bondage for being the cause of the Civil War.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Word Count: 135

Section B: Summary of Evidence

There are myriad of events that province that bondage was the chief cause for the oncoming of the Civil War ( 1861-1865 ) . The issue with bondage, separated the North and the South ideologically which led to the rebellion of the Civil War.

Economic Differences

  1. Sectionalism – 1820 through 1850 ( “Causing the Civil War” )
  2. Northerners worked within a fast-paced concern and industry ( fabrication, transportation, and trading goods ) through a rate of exponential growing enforced through commercial agriculture and industrial inventions ( “Causing the Civil War” )
    1. Manufacturing expanded quickly. ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    2. Industry produced a broad scope of goods and consumer merchandises. ( “IB History” )
  3. While on the other manus, the South had their economic system based on a slow and steady agricultural foundation. Slaves would works and choice harvests for their proprietors. ( “Causing the Civil War” )
    1. Agribusiness was the foundation of the Southern economic system that depended on bondage. ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
      1. Southern wealth was defined by the sum of land and slaves owned and as Southern economic system expanded, so did bondage. ( “IB History” )
      2. Slaves were 75 per centum of the South’s population. ( “IB History” )

Conflict over New Districts

  1. The Wilmot Proviso, an effort to extinguish bondage in the new districts gained from the Mexican-American War, heightened tensenesss between the North and the South. ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
  2. Free-Soil Movement done by the Northern Democrats and Whigs. ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    1. Northern Position
      1. Supported Wilmot Proviso ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
      2. Believed all inkinesss, free or slaved, should be excluded from new land. (The Slave Power )
      3. Did non demand the terminal of bondage. (The Slave Power )
      4. Sought to maintain the West an chance of land for the Whites and did non desire to hold to vie with the labour of slaves or free inkinesss. (The Slave Power )
    2. Southern Position
      1. Opposed Wilmot Proviso ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
      2. Viewed the limitation of enlargement as a misdemeanor of their constitutional rights to take and utilize their belongings as they wished. (The Slave Power )
      3. Favored widening the Missouri Compromise of the 36aµ’30’ line. (The Slave Power )

Constitutional Disputes

  1. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    1. Created a line through the Louisiana Territory.( “Causing the Civil War” )
    2. The via media would split America into two types of provinces: free and break one’s back provinces (The Slave Power )
    3. Districts north of the parallel 36°30 ‘ would go free, while districts south of it would be slave. (The Slave Power )
  2. The Compromise of 1850 ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    1. The Compromise of 1850 allowed the immediate admittance of California as a free province. ( “Causing the Civil War” )
    2. The slave trade was abolished. ( “Causing the Civil War” )
    3. Adopt a new Fugitive Slave Law. ( “IB History” )
  3. Fugitive Slave Law of 1793 ( “IB History” )
    1. Stated that fleeting slaves were non entitled to a test by jury, could non attest on their ain behalf and a statement by the slave proprietor would convey the slave back. ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    2. In response the North passed the personal autonomy Torahs which straight contradicted the Fugitive Slave Act — -raised tensenesss. ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
  4. The Kansas-Nebraska Act ( 1854 ) which renewed sectional contention that had been resolved by the Compromise of 1850 and repealed the Compromise of 1920. ( “IB History” )
    1. Divided the Nebraska Territory into the Kansas Territory and Nebraska Territory.
    2. Settlers had the determination of being free or break one’s back provinces ( “Causes of the Civil War” )

Extremism

  1. Shed blooding Kansas was a effect in the act of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. A bloody and hideous happening that happened before the Election of 1856. ( “The Main Causes of the Civil War” )
    1. Antislavery husbandmans from the Midwest migrated to Kansas ( “IB History” )
    2. Slaveholders from Missouri set up homesteads to win control for South ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    3. Northern emancipationists and free-soilers responded by paying antislavery colonists for transit with grants to travel to Kansas ( “Causes of the Civil War” )
    4. Contending broke out

Word Count: 552

Section C: Evaluations of Beginnings

Leonardo Richards,The Slave Power: The Free North and Southern Domination, 1780—1860

This beginning was published in the twelvemonth 2000 in the province of Louisiana. The chief intent of Richards,The Slave Power, was to restore a treatment efficaciously discontinued by historiographers since the 1920s which showed how of import bondage was, non merely through the position point of the South but of the whole national system in general, which includes the North. This was a really valuable and powerful primary beginning to my probe. As, Richards explains the development of the “Slave Power” statement over clip through the usage of insightful biographical cameos, from both sides, and narrative sketchs. He, besides, hints back the importance of the North’s call towards slaveocracy and why the Northerners had a good ground to believe in it. While at the same clip, it followed back to the thought of the South’s laterality through the upcoming of the Civil War because of their defence in enlargement of the inhumane establishment of bondage. This beginning has some restrictions in the sense that it was biased ; nevertheless, Richards referenced schemes in part to all of the political parties: The Democrats, Free- Soilers, Whigs, and Republicans.

Word Count: 186

Bruce Chadwick, “Causing the Civil War”

This secondary beginning was publicized on TeachingHistory.org in the twelvemonth of 2009 by Bruce Chadwick. “Bruce Chadwick, a former journalist, is a historian, lector, and writer of 28 books on assorted subjects including the Civil War” ( Causing the Civil War ) . The chief intent of this beginning was to place that bondage was the most of import factor that caused the Civil War. Chadwick did this by analysing assorted events that led by to the war which helped warrant his claim on behalf of why the Civil War had begun. This beginning was a valuable towards my probe in the sense that it allowed me to get more historical cognition to an analytical position point, in which Bruce insisted of making. However, it was written based upon his ideas and what he thought caused the war. This beginning is potentially limited to a colored position point in the sense of Chadwick voicing his sentiment. This beginning holds a valid acquisition to the extent that Bruce earned a doctor’s degree in American history in 1994.

Word Count: 171

Section D: Analysis

This probe is of import in its historical content because bondage was the chief cause of the Civil War ( 1861-1865 ) . Slavery created tenseness between the North and South in the sense that it caused them to divide due to their ideological differences. This factor was known as provincialism, it connects to the chief thought that slavery being the cause of the Civil War, because provincialism was a flicker that

Section Tocopherol: Decision

Although, there were legion of other factors that played a part to the rebellion of the Civil War, bondage played the primary cause of it. Other factors include John Brown ‘s foray on Harper ‘s Ferry in 1859, and President Buchanan ‘s refusal to intercede between North and South, wholly connected to the progressively acrimonious argument over bondage. Despite the fact, that bondage was a barbarous establishment in America towards worlds, specifically African-Americans ; it did convey great treatment in favour of either side, the North or the South. This treatment led to sezession after sezession, with both sides wanting different hereafters in regard to bondage. The North desiring to get rid of bondage all throughout America ; while on the other manus, the South wanted bondage for plantation enlargement. The overall position on this instance is that bondage, in all its attempt, caused the North and South to split ideologically with both sides warranting their position point on the construct of bondage, which sooner became the start of the Civil War.

Word Count: 156

Section F: Plants Cited

Book:

Richards, Leonard L.The Slave Power: The Free North and Southern Domination, 1780-1860. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2000. Print.

Internet Pages:

“ Causing the Civil War. ”Teaching History. N.p. , n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.

“ IB History. ”United States Civil War –. N.p. , n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.

Shmoop Editorial Team. “ Causes of the Civil War Footings. ”Shmoop.com. Shmoop University, Inc. , 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 15 May 2014.

“ The Main Cause of the Civil War. ”Adolescent Ink. N.p. , n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.

x

Hi!
I'm Amanda

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out