William Shakespeare entertains multiple subjects throughout his sonnet aggregation and portays an overarching subject of love. Sir Philip Sydney’s troubles with love are shown in his aggregation of sonnets “Astrophil and Stella” . Both poets discuss the complications with love and the desire it creates. For illustration. in sonnet 1 Sydney has problem conveying his love but hopes that through these sonnets she ( Stella ) will understand. Shakespeare’s sonnet 129 every bit good as Sydney sonnet 109 both reference the ground for their adversities with love: what is fueling their desire.
Both are fighting with lecherousness but use different tones. ditcions and logical thinkings to get at the same point. Shakespeare’s Sonnet 129 is grouped with verse forms known as the “dark” adult female sonnets. This set of verse forms are on the darker side of Shakepeares authoritative love sonnets. Love is overbearing and causes the talker to make things he usually wouldn’t. He claims that expectancy of sex creates fickle human behaviour. Shakespeare uses in writing imagination. “murderous. bloody. full of blame” to exemplify his defeat towards the state of affairs ( 3 ) . He blames his sexual desires and claims that they are driving him to insanity ( “make… . taker mad” ( 8 ) ) .
To him. lecherousness is a wickedness and is the root of peoples pain. Throughout the verse form the order of words tends to be reversed and repeated ( “mad” . “past reason” ) to intensify the feeling of struggle. as in line 2: “lust in action ; and till action. lecherousness. ” Despite intuition he is bound by passion and inquiries why he should “purs [ ue ] ” what he knows to be worthless ( “swallow’d bait” ) . The verse form explains that sex is blissful while your’re making it and. one time you’re done. a true sorrow that it of all time happened A cloud nine in cogent evidence. – and prov’d. a really suffering ;
Before. a joy propos’d ; behind. a dream: … ( 11-12 ) . Here he embelishes the impression that people will travel to absurd lengths in the chase of sex but end up detesting themselves for it afterwards. Sydney’s Sonnet 109 instantly identifies ‘desire’ as the adversary of the poet. In the first line he refers to love as a trap ( “snare” ) for the ignorant to fall for. But Sydney has already fallen into this “love trap” and is mentioning to himself as the “fool” to make so. Syndey in the first few lines considers himself foolish for experiencing this desire.
He claims that desire leads people to move doltishly: “With scattered thought” and “causeless care” . that while seeking to carry through a foolish undertaking he was blowing his clip. All his difficult work was for nil. devouring his reason. Sydney and Shakespeare blame themselves for their craving of love. desire. The talker in sonnet 129 can’t assist his entreaty to this “dark” adult female he refers. He knows it is painful to allow desire travel. He understands the self-hating decision to his lecherousness but can’t help his actions: “Before. a joy propos’d ; behind. a dream” ( 12 ) .
While Shakespeare anticipates sex. it seems like joy ; subsequently. a bad dream. Blaming his sexual attractive force to others as a culpit for personal torment. Sydney describes the same battles in his sonnet 109. To Sydney the procedure of falling in love is nil but anguish. His “mangled mind” knows it worthless to experience this manner and. similar to Shakespeare. doesn’t “know how to kill desire” ( 14 ) . Both talkers convey an ambivalent tone towards desire. In line 5 Sydney has given into desire but in line 6 knows of its uselessness “Desire! Desire! I have excessively in a heartfelt way brought / worthelesse ware” .
Similarly. in the pair at the terminal of Sonnet 129 Shakespeare writes “All this the universe good knows” to avoid the celestial experience caused by desire because it “leads work forces to this hell” ( 13-14 ) . The writers identify what the result of their desires will be but let it to go on anyways. Desire turns the talkers mad. In Shakespeare’s instance the desire for sex is “on intent laid to do the taker mad” ( 8 ) ; He has experienced all the phases of lecherousness and each clip it has made him brainsick. As for Sydney. the mention to “mangled mind” explains that he is on his manner to insanity.
He paid for his desire by driving “ [ him ] self” loony. Sydney and Shakespeare seem to non cognize what to make. They are confused with the hurting for love they possess. And it drives the talkers. whether it be Shakespeare or Sydney. to insanity. Both poets every bit good express the thought elsewhere that the “dark” adult females and “Stella” are superior to them. They believe that they are at mistake for this desire they occupy. In Sonnet 129 the poets enterprises convince him that the “dark” lady is better than he knows her to be. Similarily. Sydney makes it apparent that this desire is a defect in himself and non in the desired.
In Sonnet 129 Shakespeare makes it obscure to whether or non he is the talker. Sydney seems to do it more apparent by utilizing point of position such as “I have” . Under the rubric of a individual subject the reader notices as many similarites as differences. Shakespeare uses really different sentence structure than Sydney to show the same thought. First of all. Sonnet 129 concerns physical appetencies that are blamed for fueling sexual desires. “Is lecherousness in action ; and till action. lust” ( 2 ) . Sydneys sonnet 109 incriminations his emotional feelings his head can’t aid but experience “Within my ego to seek my lone hire” ( 13 ) .
Shakespeare uses mutiple appositions such as “before”/ “behind” and “heavan”/ “hell” . The appositions allowed Shakespeare to convey both sides of his suffers. The vulgar tone in sonnet 129 contributes to the talkers hatred for physical desires. That it makes people “savage. extreme. rude. cruel. non to swear ; ” ( 4 ) . Shakespeare explains precisely what will go on when one undergoes these sexual longings “Past ground hunted ; and no Oklahoman had. / Past ground hated. as a swallow’d bait” ( 6-7 ) leting no room for reading. Sydney. on the other manus. exlpains the hurting he feels. but is non exact what will go on later.
He recognizes the decision but doesn’t know what it will fell wish. Sydney understands that his desire will be worthless. Sonnet 129’s talker has experienced desires worthlessness. He asserts that everyone knows and will complete as he did. in torment and hurting: “All this the universe good knows” ( 13 ) . The list’s Shakespeares writes helps explicate his defeat with sex and the “dark” lady. List’s solify inside informations to pas experiences. It gives the reader more grounds to the talkers sentiment. Whereas. Syndey effectivley emphasizes his point through punction and repition “Desire! . Desire! ” ( 5 ) . Converting the reader of Sydneys problems.
Sydney and Shakespeare suggest that love drives them out of control but have their ain position on the strength of the emphasis. Some people would see that these feelings are more than criterion. Not that they are overstating feelings in the sonnets but drive themselves to an utmost phase of abhoring. Sydney expresses a lyrical tone compared to Shakespeares contemptuous tone. Syndey voices his interior feelings and reads as though he has thought a batch about his battles. In line 8 he writes “Who shouldst my head to higher things prepare” . and explains that his head should concentrate on more of import things than desire.
The usage of “my mind” suggests that Sydney is seeking to convert himself to concentrate on more of import things. This plays in straight with his lyrical tone. Shakespeare. on the other manus. is more contemptuous in his authorship. “Had. holding. and in quest to hold. extreme ; ” ( 10 ) and contemptuous towards his engagements with desire. In the terminal. Shakespeare in sonnet 129 and Sydney in sonnet 109 both write about their battles with lecherousness. Syndey composes his feelings throughout sonnet 109 while Shakespeare makes it apparent of his contemptuous place towards want itself.